Fajish G, et al. (2024) DNA double-strand breaks regulate the cleavage-independent release of Rec8-cohesin during yeast meiosis. Genes Cells 29(1):86-98 PMID:37968127
Joo JH, et al. (2024) RPA interacts with Rad52 to promote meiotic crossover and noncrossover recombination. Nucleic Acids Res 52(7):3794-3809 PMID:38340339
Mwaniki S, et al. (2024) Mutational analysis of Mei5, a subunit of Mei5-Sae3 complex, in Dmc1-mediated recombination during yeast meiosis. Genes Cells 29(8):650-666 PMID:38924305
Sampathkumar A, et al. (2024) Replication protein-A, RPA, plays a pivotal role in the maintenance of recombination checkpoint in yeast meiosis. Sci Rep 14(1):9550 PMID:38664461
Sawant P, et al. (2023) The role of conserved amino acid residues of Sae3 in Mei5-Sae3 complex for Dmc1 assembly in meiotic recombination. Genes Genet Syst 98(1):45-52 PMID:37225456
Shinohara M and Shinohara A (2023) The Msh5 complex shows homeostatic localization in response to DNA double-strand breaks in yeast meiosis. Front Cell Dev Biol 11:1170689 PMID:37274743
Lee MS, et al. (2021) The synaptonemal complex central region modulates crossover pathways and feedback control of meiotic double-strand break formation. Nucleic Acids Res 49(13):7537-7553 PMID:34197600
Prasada Rao HB, et al. (2021) Phosphorylation of luminal region of the SUN-domain protein Mps3 promotes nuclear envelope localization during meiosis. Elife 10 PMID:34586062
Usui T and Shinohara A (2021) Rad9, a 53BP1 Ortholog of Budding Yeast, Is Insensitive to Spo11-Induced Double-Strand Breaks During Meiosis. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:635383 PMID:33842461
Woo TT, et al. (2020) Dual roles of yeast Rad51 N-terminal domain in repairing DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 48(15):8474-8489 PMID:32652040
Zhang Y, et al. (2020) Genetic Interactions of Histone Modification Machinery Set1 and PAF1C with the Recombination Complex Rec114-Mer2-Mei4 in the Formation of Meiotic DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Int J Mol Sci 21(8) PMID:32290544
Bommi JR, et al. (2019) Meiosis-specific cohesin component, Rec8, promotes the localization of Mps3 SUN domain protein on the nuclear envelope. Genes Cells 24(1):94-106 PMID:30417519
Challa K, et al. (2019) Meiotic prophase-like pathway for cleavage-independent removal of cohesin for chromosome morphogenesis. Curr Genet 65(4):817-827 PMID:30923890
Sasanuma H, et al. (2019) Srs2 helicase prevents the formation of toxic DNA damage during late prophase I of yeast meiosis. Chromosoma 128(3):453-471 PMID:31168653
Shinohara M, et al. (2019) Distinct Functions in Regulation of Meiotic Crossovers for DNA Damage Response Clamp Loader Rad24(Rad17) and Mec1(ATR) Kinase. Genetics 213(4):1255-1269 PMID:31597673
Chakraborty P, et al. (2017) Modulating Crossover Frequency and Interference for Obligate Crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Meiosis. G3 (Bethesda) 7(5):1511-1524 PMID:28315832
Challa K, et al. (2016) Rad61/Wpl1 (Wapl), a cohesin regulator, controls chromosome compaction during meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res 44(7):3190-203 PMID:26825462
Gothwal SK, et al. (2016) The Double-Strand Break Landscape of Meiotic Chromosomes Is Shaped by the Paf1 Transcription Elongation Complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 202(2):497-512 PMID:26627841
Shinohara M, et al. (2015) DNA damage response clamp 9-1-1 promotes assembly of ZMM proteins for formation of crossovers and synaptonemal complex. J Cell Sci 128(8):1494-506 PMID:25736290
Bani Ismail M, et al. (2014) Dot1-dependent histone H3K79 methylation promotes the formation of meiotic double-strand breaks in the absence of histone H3K4 methylation in budding yeast. PLoS One 9(5):e96648 PMID:24797370
Shinohara M and Shinohara A (2013) Multiple pathways suppress non-allelic homologous recombination during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 8(4):e63144 PMID:23646187
Rao HB, et al. (2011) Mps3 SUN domain is important for chromosome motion and juxtaposition of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. Genes Cells 16(11):1081-96 PMID:22017544
Conrad MN, et al. (2008) Rapid telomere movement in meiotic prophase is promoted by NDJ1, MPS3, and CSM4 and is modulated by recombination. Cell 133(7):1175-87 PMID:18585352
Matsuzaki K, et al. (2008) Forkhead-associated domain of yeast Xrs2, a homolog of human Nbs1, promotes nonhomologous end joining through interaction with a ligase IV partner protein, Lif1. Genetics 179(1):213-25 PMID:18458108
Shinohara M, et al. (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40(3):299-309 PMID:18297071
Hayase A, et al. (2004) A protein complex containing Mei5 and Sae3 promotes the assembly of the meiosis-specific RecA homolog Dmc1. Cell 119(7):927-40 PMID:15620352
Miyazaki T, et al. (2004) In vivo assembly and disassembly of Rad51 and Rad52 complexes during double-strand break repair. EMBO J 23(4):939-49 PMID:14765116
Yamashita K, et al. (2004) Rad6-Bre1-mediated histone H2B ubiquitylation modulates the formation of double-strand breaks during meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(31):11380-5 PMID:15280549
Shinohara M, et al. (2003) Crossover interference in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires a TID1/RDH54- and DMC1-dependent pathway. Genetics 163(4):1273-86 PMID:12702674
Shinohara M, et al. (2003) The mitotic DNA damage checkpoint proteins Rad17 and Rad24 are required for repair of double-strand breaks during meiosis in yeast. Genetics 164(3):855-65 PMID:12871899
Tsukamoto M, et al. (2003) The N-terminal DNA-binding domain of Rad52 promotes RAD51-independent recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 165(4):1703-15 PMID:14704160
Hong EL, et al. (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Dmc1 protein promotes renaturation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA) and assimilation of ssDNA into homologous super-coiled duplex DNA. J Biol Chem 276(45):41906-12 PMID:11551925
Kim JM, et al. (2001) Effect of ions and nucleotides on the interactions of yeast Rad51 protein with single-stranded oligonucleotides. J Biochem 129(3):469-75 PMID:11226888
Shinohara M, et al. (2000) Tid1/Rdh54 promotes colocalization of rad51 and dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(20):10814-9 PMID:11005857
Gasior SL, et al. (1998) Rad52 associates with RPA and functions with rad55 and rad57 to assemble meiotic recombination complexes. Genes Dev 12(14):2208-21 PMID:9679065
Katagiri T, et al. (1998) Multiple possible sites of BRCA2 interacting with DNA repair protein RAD51. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 21(3):217-22 PMID:9523196
Nishinaka T, et al. (1998) Base pair switching by interconversion of sugar puckers in DNA extended by proteins of RecA-family: a model for homology search in homologous genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(19):11071-6 PMID:9736691
Yamaguchi-Iwai Y, et al. (1998) Homologous recombination, but not DNA repair, is reduced in vertebrate cells deficient in RAD52. Mol Cell Biol 18(11):6430-5 PMID:9774659
Mizuta R, et al. (1997) RAB22 and RAB163/mouse BRCA2: proteins that specifically interact with the RAD51 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94(13):6927-32 PMID:9192668
Shinohara A, et al. (1997) Saccharomyces cerevisiae recA homologues RAD51 and DMC1 have both distinct and overlapping roles in meiotic recombination. Genes Cells 2(10):615-29 PMID:9427283
Shinohara M, et al. (1997) Characterization of the roles of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD54 gene and a homologue of RAD54, RDH54/TID1, in mitosis and meiosis. Genetics 147(4):1545-56 PMID:9409820
Maeshima K, et al. (1995) RAD51 homologues in Xenopus laevis: two distinct genes are highly expressed in ovary and testis. Gene 160(2):195-200 PMID:7642095
Bezzubova O, et al. (1993) A chicken RAD51 homologue is expressed at high levels in lymphoid and reproductive organs. Nucleic Acids Res 21(7):1577-80 PMID:8479908
Ogawa T, et al. (1993) RecA-like recombination proteins in eukaryotes: functions and structures of RAD51 genes. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 58:567-76 PMID:7956071
Shinohara A, et al. (1993) Cloning of human, mouse and fission yeast recombination genes homologous to RAD51 and recA. Nat Genet 4(3):239-43 PMID:8358431