Introns in different genes, or even different introns within the same gene, often have different splice sites and differ in splicing efficiency (SE). One expects mass-transcribed genes to have introns with higher SE than weakly transcribed genes. However, such a simple expectation cannot be tested directly because variable SE for these genes is often not measured. Mechanistically, SE should depend on signal strength at key splice sites (SS) such as 5'SS, 3'SS and branchpoint site (BPS), i.e., SE = F(5'SS, 3'SS, BPS). However, without SE, we again cannot model how these splice sites contribute to SE. Here I present an RNA-Seq approach to quantify SE for each of the 304 introns in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) genes, including 24 in the 5'UTR, by measuring 1) number of reads mapped to exon-exon junctions (N_EE) as a proxy for the abundance of spliced form, and 2) number of reads mapped to exon-intron junction (N_EI5 and N_EI3 at 5' and 3' ends of intron) as a proxy for the abundance of unspliced form. The total mRNA is N_Total = N_EE + p * N_EI5 + (1-p) * N_EI3, with the simplest p = 0.5 but statistical methods were presented to estimate p from data. An estimated p is needed because N_EI5 is expected to be smaller than N_EI3 due to 1) step 1 splicing occurs before step 2 so EI5 is broken before EI3, 2) enrichment of poly(A) mRNA by oligo-dT, and 3) 5' degradation. SE is defined as the proportion (N_EE/N_Total). Application of the method shows that ribosomal protein messages are efficiently and mostly cotranscriptionally spliced. Yeast genes with long introns are also spliced efficiently. HAC1/YFL031W is poorly spliced partly because its splicing involves a nonspliceosome mechanism and partly because Ire1p, which participate in splicing HAC1, is hardly expressed. Many putative yeast genes have low SE, and some splice sites are incorrectly annotated.

• PMID: 30926533
• DOI full text
• PubMed
• PubTator

Reference Type

Journal Article | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Authors

Xia X

Primary Lit For

Additional Lit For

Review For