In the early days of the yeast genome sequencing project, gene annotation was in its infancy and suffered the problem of many false positive annotations as well as missed genes. The lack of other sequences for comparison also prevented the annotation of conserved, functional sequences that were not coding. We are now in an era of comparative genomics where many closely related as well as more distantly related genomes are available for direct sequence and synteny comparisons allowing for more probable predictions of genes and other functional sequences due to conservation. We also have a plethora of functional genomics data which helps inform gene annotation for previously uncharacterised open reading frames (ORFs)/genes. For Saccharomyces cerevisiae this has resulted in a continuous updating of the gene and functional sequence annotations in the reference genome helping it retain its position as the best characterized eukaryotic organism's genome. A single reference genome for a species does not accurately describe the species and this is quite clear in the case of S. cerevisiae where the reference strain is not ideal for brewing or baking due to missing genes. Recent surveys of numerous isolates, from a variety of sources, using a variety of technologies have revealed a great deal of variation amongst isolates with genome sequence surveys providing information on novel genes, undetectable by other means. We now have a better understanding of the extant variation in S. cerevisiae as a species as well as some idea of how much we are missing from this understanding. As with gene annotation, comparative genomics enhances the discovery and description of genome variation and is providing us with the tools for understanding genome evolution, adaptation and selection, and underlying genetics of complex traits.

• PMID: 21863479
• DOI full text
• PubMed
• PubTator

Reference Type

Comparative Study | Journal Article

Authors

Louis E

Primary Lit For

Additional Lit For

Review For