SGD Paper 
Huebert DJ and Gasch AP (2012) Defining flexible vs. inherent promoter architectures: the importance of dynamics and environmental considerations. Nucleus 3(5):399-403
Abstract: The degree to which nucleosome positioning regulates transcription is an ongoing debate. To address this question, we recently followed dynamic changes in nucleosome occupancy, transcription factor binding and gene expression in yeast cells responding to oxidative stress. Integrating across these dynamic processes revealed new insights into the functions of nucleosome reorganization. Here, we used our data to address the extent to which upstream promoter architecture is a static feature inherent to specific genes vs. a dynamic platform that changes across conditions. Our results argue that, while some aspects of promoter architecture are fixed across environments, the level to which promoters are "open" or "covered" by nucleosomes depends on the conditions investigated.
| Status: Published | Type: Journal Article | PubMed ID: 22751015 |
Topics addressed in this paper
- To find other papers on a gene and topic, click on the colored ball in the appropriate box.
- displays other papers with information about that topic for that gene.
- displays other papers in SGD that are associated with that topic.
The topic is addressed in these papers but does not describe a specific gene or chromosomal feature.
- To go to the Locus page for a gene, click on the gene name.
| Topics | Topics not linked to Genes | Genes linked to topics |
|---|---|---|
| MSN2 | ||
| Mutants/Phenotypes |  | |
| Omics | 
| |
| Other genomic analysis |
| |
| Primary Literature | | |
| Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions | | |
| Strains/Constructs | | |
| Substrates/Ligands/Cofactors | |
