MCM1/YMR043W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for MCM1: FUN80, YMR043W

MCM1 - Substrates/Ligands/Cofactors (20)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Sharon E, et al.  (2012) Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters.LID - 10.1038/nbt.2205 [doi] Nat Biotechnol ()
Bai L, et al.  (2011) Multiple Sequence-Specific Factors Generate the Nucleosome-Depleted Region on CLN2 Promoter. Mol Cell 42(4):465-76
Lu CC, et al.  (2008) Extracting transcription factor binding sites from unaligned gene sequences with statistical models. BMC Bioinformatics 9 Suppl 12:S7
Shida K  (2006) GibbsST: a Gibbs sampling method for motif discovery with enhanced resistance to local optima. BMC Bioinformatics 7:486
Wu WS, et al.  (2006) Computational reconstruction of transcriptional regulatory modules of the yeast cell cycle. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1):421
Galgoczy DJ, et al.  (2004) Genomic dissection of the cell-type-specification circuit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(52):18069-74
Keles S, et al.  (2004) Regulatory motif finding by logic regression. Bioinformatics 20(16):2799-811
Reynolds D, et al.  (2003) Recruitment of Thr 319-phosphorylated Ndd1p to the FHA domain of Fkh2p requires Clb kinase activity: a mechanism for CLB cluster gene activation. Genes Dev 17(14):1789-802
Jamai A, et al.  (2002) Swapping functional specificity of a MADS box protein: residues required for Arg80 regulation of arginine metabolism. Mol Cell Biol 22(16):5741-52
Mead J, et al.  (2002) Interactions of the Mcm1 MADS box protein with cofactors that regulate mating in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 22(13):4607-21
Turner SD, et al.  (2002) The E2 ubiquitin conjugase Rad6 is required for the ArgR/Mcm1 repression of ARG1 transcription. Mol Cell Biol 22(12):4011-9
Mathias JR, et al.  (2001) Altering the DNA-binding specificity of the yeast Matalpha 2 homeodomain protein. J Biol Chem 276(35):32696-703
Amar N, et al.  (2000) ArgRII, a component of the ArgR-Mcm1 complex involved in the control of arginine metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is the sensor of arginine. Mol Cell Biol 20(6):2087-97
Chi TH and Crabtree GR  (2000) Perspectives: signal transduction. Inositol phosphates in the nucleus. Science 287(5460):1937-9
Kumar R, et al.  (2000) Forkhead transcription factors, Fkh1p and Fkh2p, collaborate with Mcm1p to control transcription required for M-phase. Curr Biol 10(15):896-906
Loy CJ, et al.  (1999) NDD1, a high-dosage suppressor of cdc28-1N, is essential for expression of a subset of late-S-phase-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19(5):3312-27
Ganter B, et al.  (1993) Genomic footprinting of the promoter regions of STE2 and STE3 genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Mol Biol 234(4):975-87
Bruhn L, et al.  (1992) The N-terminal 96 residues of MCM1, a regulator of cell type-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are sufficient for DNA binding, transcription activation, and interaction with alpha 1. Mol Cell Biol 12(8):3563-72
Wynne J and Treisman R  (1992) SRF and MCM1 have related but distinct DNA binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res 20(13):3297-303
Passmore S, et al.  (1989) A protein involved in minichromosome maintenance in yeast binds a transcriptional enhancer conserved in eukaryotes. Genes Dev 3(7):921-35