MSH4/YFL003C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for MSH4: MutS family protein MSH4, YFL003C

MSH4 - Strains/Constructs (23)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
De Muyt A, et al.  (2012) BLM Helicase Ortholog Sgs1 Is a Central Regulator of Meiotic Recombination Intermediate Metabolism. Mol Cell 46(1):43-53
Lang GI and Murray AW  (2011) Mutation rates across budding yeast chromosome VI are correlated with replication timing. Genome Biol Evol 3():799-811
Reid RJ, et al.  (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3):477-86
Falk JE, et al.  (2010) A Mec1- and PP4-dependent checkpoint couples centromere pairing to meiotic recombination. Dev Cell 19(4):599-611
Newnham L, et al.  (2010) The synaptonemal complex protein, Zip1, promotes the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes at meiosis I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(2):781-5
Nishant KT, et al.  (2010) Genetic analysis of baker's yeast Msh4-Msh5 reveals a threshold crossover level for meiotic viability. PLoS Genet 6(8):e1001083
Bourgon R, et al.  (2009) Array-based genotyping in S.cerevisiae using semi-supervised clustering. Bioinformatics 25(8):1056-62
Rockmill B  (2009) Chromosome Spreading and Immunofluorescence Methods in Saccharomyes cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 558:3-13
Kosaka H, et al.  (2008) Csm4-dependent telomere movement on nuclear envelope promotes meiotic recombination. PLoS Genet 4(9):e1000196
Mancera E, et al.  (2008) High-resolution mapping of meiotic crossovers and non-crossovers in yeast. Nature 454(7203):479-85
Shinohara M, et al.  (2008) Crossover assurance and crossover interference are distinctly regulated by the ZMM proteins during yeast meiosis. Nat Genet 40(3):299-309
Abdullah MF, et al.  (2004) A role for the MutL homologue MLH2 in controlling heteroduplex formation and in regulating between two different crossover pathways in budding yeast. Cytogenet Genome Res 107(3-4):180-90
Argueso JL, et al.  (2004) Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168(4):1805-16
Stahl FW, et al.  (2004) Does crossover interference count in Saccharomyces cerevisiae? Genetics 168(1):35-48
Kearney HM, et al.  (2001) Meiotic recombination involving heterozygous large insertions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: formation and repair of large, unpaired DNA loops. Genetics 158(4):1457-76
Novak JE, et al.  (2001) The budding yeast Msh4 protein functions in chromosome synapsis and the regulation of crossover distribution. Genetics 158(3):1013-25
Khazanehdari KA and Borts RH  (2000) EXO1 and MSH4 differentially affect crossing-over and segregation. Chromosoma 109(1-2):94-102
Malkova A, et al.  (2000) HO endonuclease-induced recombination in yeast meiosis resembles Spo11-induced events. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97(26):14500-5
Miret JJ, et al.  (1996) Recognition of DNA insertion/deletion mismatches by an activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 24(4):721-9
Naitou M, et al.  (1996) Sequencing of a 23 kb fragment from Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosome VI. Yeast 12(1):77-84
Hollingsworth NM, et al.  (1995) MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev 9(14):1728-39
Murakami Y, et al.  (1995) Analysis of the nucleotide sequence of chromosome VI from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Genet 10(3):261-8
Ross-Macdonald P and Roeder GS  (1994) Mutation of a meiosis-specific MutS homolog decreases crossing over but not mismatch correction. Cell 79(6):1069-80