Other names published for INO80: chromatin-remodeling ATPase INO80, YGL150C
INO80 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Other Features
- Strains/Constructs
- Techniques and Reagents
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Additional Information
INO80 - Strains/Constructs (33)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Konarzewska P, et al. (2012) INO1 induction requires chromatin remodelers Ino80p and Snf2p but not the histone acetylases. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 418(3):483-8 | |
| Neumann FR, et al. (2012) Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev 26(4):369-83 | |
| Au TJ, et al. (2011) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity. Mol Cell Biol 31(22):4454-63 | |
| Papamichos-Chronakis M, et al. (2011) Global Regulation of H2A.Z Localization by the INO80 Chromatin-Remodeling Enzyme Is Essential for Genome Integrity. Cell 144(2):200-13 | |
| Czaja W, et al. (2010) Proficient repair in chromatin remodeling defective ino80 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae highlights replication defects as the main contributor to DNA damage sensitivity. DNA Repair (Amst) 9(9):976-984 | |
| Morillo-Huesca M, et al. (2010) The SWR1 Histone Replacement Complex Causes Genetic Instability and Genome-Wide Transcription Misregulation in the Absence of H2A.Z.LID - e12143 [pii] PLoS One 5(8) | |
| Sarkar S, et al. (2010) The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex restores chromatin structure during UV DNA damage repair. J Cell Biol 191(6):1061-8 | |
| Schulze JM, et al. (2010) The YEATS domain of Taf14 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae has a negative impact on cell growth. Mol Genet Genomics 283(4):365-80 | |
| Falbo KB, et al. (2009) Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16(11):1167-72 | |
| Fernandez-Murray JP, et al. (2009) NTE1-encoded phosphatidylcholine phospholipase b regulates transcription of phospholipid biosynthetic genes. J Biol Chem 284(52):36034-46 | |
| Hannum G, et al. (2009) Genome-wide association data reveal a global map of genetic interactions among protein complexes. PLoS Genet 5(12):e1000782 | |
| Wippo CJ, et al. (2009) Differential cofactor requirements for histone eviction from two nucleosomes at the yeast PHO84 promoter are determined by intrinsic nucleosome stability. Mol Cell Biol 29(11):2960-81 | |
| Ford J, et al. (2008) Activator-dependent recruitment of SWI/SNF and INO80 during INO1 activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 373(4):602-6 | |
| Papamichos-Chronakis M and Peterson CL (2008) The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(4):338-45 | |
| Sekiguchi T, et al. (2008) Genetic evidence that Ras-like GTPases, Gtr1p, and Gtr2p, are involved in epigenetic control of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 368(3):748-54 | |
| Shimada K, et al. (2008) Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr Biol 18(8):566-75 | |
| Szerlong H, et al. (2008) The HSA domain binds nuclear actin-related proteins to regulate chromatin-remodeling ATPases. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(5):469-76 | |
| Vincent JA, et al. (2008) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling shapes the DNA replication landscape. Nat Struct Mol Biol 15(5):477-84 | |
| Barbaric S, et al. (2007) Redundancy of Chromatin Remodeling Pathways for the Induction of the Yeast PHO5 Promoter in Vivo. J Biol Chem 282(38):27610-21 | |
| Ford J, et al. (2007) A SWI/SNF- and INO80-dependent nucleosome movement at the INO1 promoter. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 361(4):974-9 | |
| Yu EY, et al. (2007) Regulation of telomere structure and functions by subunits of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol Cell Biol 27(16):5639-49 | |
| van Attikum H, et al. (2007) Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J 26(18):4113-25 | |
| Papamichos-Chronakis M, et al. (2006) Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev 20(17):2437-49 | |
| Kabani M, et al. (2005) Anc1 interacts with the catalytic subunits of the general transcription factors TFIID and TFIIF, the chromatin remodeling complexes RSC and INO80, and the histone acetyltransferase complex NuA3. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 332(2):398-403 | |
| Downs JA, et al. (2004) Binding of chromatin-modifying activities to phosphorylated histone H2A at DNA damage sites. Mol Cell 16(6):979-90 | |
| Jonsson ZO, et al. (2004) Rvb1p/Rvb2p recruit Arp5p and assemble a functional Ino80 chromatin remodeling complex. Mol Cell 16(3):465-77 | |
| Morrison AJ, et al. (2004) INO80 and gamma-H2AX interaction links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling to DNA damage repair. Cell 119(6):767-75 | |
| van Attikum H, et al. (2004) Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119(6):777-88 | |
| Shen X, et al. (2003) Involvement of actin-related proteins in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Mol Cell 12(1):147-55 | |
| Steger DJ, et al. (2003) Regulation of chromatin remodeling by inositol polyphosphates. Science 299(5603):114-6 |





