Other names published for GAL4: GAL81, YPL248C
GAL4 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Other Features
- Strains/Constructs
- Techniques and Reagents
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
GAL4 - Strains/Constructs (127)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Abramczyk D, et al. (2012) Interplay of a ligand sensor and an enzyme in controlling expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL genes. Eukaryot Cell 11(3):334-42 | |
| Atanesyan L, et al. (2012) Polyglutamine tracts as modulators of transcriptional activation from yeast to mammals. Biol Chem 393(1-2):63-70 | |
| Hsu C, et al. (2012) Stochastic signalling rewires the interaction map of a multiple feedback network during yeast evolution. Nat Commun 3():682 | |
| Lin L, et al. (2012) Analysis of Gal4-directed transcription activation using Tra1 mutants selectively defective for interaction with Gal4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109(6):1997-2002 | |
| Ryo S, et al. (2012) Transplantation of the GAL regulon into G-protein signaling circuitry in yeast. Anal Biochem 424(1):27-31 | |
| Sikorski TW, et al. (2012) Proteomic analysis demonstrates activator- and chromatin-specific recruitment to promoters. J Biol Chem 287(42):35397-408 | |
| Barnard E and Timson DJ (2011) The GAL genetic switch: visualisation of the interacting proteins by split-EGFP bimolecular fluorescence complementation. J Basic Microbiol 51(3):312-7 | |
| Campbell RN, et al. (2011) Isolation of compensatory inhibitor domain mutants to novel activation domain variants using the split-ubiquitin screen. Yeast 28(8):569-78 | |
| Egriboz O, et al. (2011) Rapid GAL gene switch of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on nuclear Gal3, not nucleocytoplasmic trafficking of Gal3 and Gal80. Genetics 189(3):825-36 | |
| Marucci L, et al. (2011) Derivation, identification and validation of a computational model of a novel synthetic regulatory network in yeast. J Math Biol 62(5):685-706 | |
| Acar M, et al. (2010) A general mechanism for network-dosage compensation in gene circuits. Science 329(5999):1656-60 | |
| Archer CT and Kodadek T (2010) The hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin is required to protect transactivator-promoter complexes from destabilization by the proteasomal ATPases. Nucleic Acids Res 38(3):789-96 | |
| Dutoit R, et al. (2010) Selection systems based on dominant-negative transcription factors for precise genetic engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 38(19):e183 | |
| Hoke SM, et al. (2010) Mutational analysis of the C-terminal FATC domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tra1. Curr Genet 56(5):447-65 | |
| Lee SK, et al. (2010) Activation of a Poised RNAPII-Dependent Promoter Requires Both SAGA and Mediator. Genetics 184(3):659-72 | |
| Li Y, et al. (2010) Alterations in the Interaction Between GAL4 and GAL80 Effect Regulation of the Yeast GAL Regulon Mediated by the F box Protein Dsg1. Curr Microbiol 61(3):210-6 | |
| Zheng J, et al. (2010) Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors. Mol Syst Biol 6():420 | |
| Cantone I, et al. (2009) A yeast synthetic network for in vivo assessment of reverse-engineering and modeling approaches. Cell 137(1):172-81 | |
| El Kaderi B, et al. (2009) Gene Looping Is Conferred by Activator-dependent Interaction of Transcription Initiation and Termination Machineries. J Biol Chem 284(37):25015-25 | |
| Jiang F, et al. (2009) Gene activation by dissociation of an inhibitor from a transcriptional activation domain. Mol Cell Biol 29(20):5604-10 | |
| Koehn DR, et al. (2009) Tethering Recombination Initiation Proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Promotes Double Strand Break Formation. Genetics 182(2):447-58 | |
| Majmudar CY, et al. (2009) Impact of nonnatural amino acid mutagenesis on the in vivo function and binding modes of a transcriptional activator. J Am Chem Soc 131(40):14240-2 | |
| Majmudar CY, et al. (2009) Tra1 as a screening target for transcriptional activation domain discovery. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(14):3733-5 | |
| Malik S, et al. (2009) The 19 s proteasome subcomplex establishes a specific protein interaction network at the promoter for stimulated transcriptional initiation in vivo. J Biol Chem 284(51):35714-24 | |
| dos Santos SC, et al. (2009) Transcriptomic profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae response to quinine reveals a glucose limitation response attributable to drug-induced inhibition of glucose uptake. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53(12):5213-23 | |
| Archer CT, et al. (2008) Activation Domain-dependent Monoubiquitylation of Gal4 Protein Is Essential for Promoter Binding in Vivo. J Biol Chem 283(18):12614-23 | |
| Bjornsdottir G and Myers LC (2008) Minimal components of the RNA polymerase II transcription apparatus determine the consensus TATA box. Nucleic Acids Res 36(9):2906-16 | |
| Choi ID, et al. (2008) Novel Ree1 regulates the expression of ENO1 via the Snf1 complex pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 377(2):395-9 | |
| Masuda CA, et al. (2008) Overexpression of the aldose reductase GRE3 suppresses lithium-induced galactose toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 8(8):1245-53 | |
| Wightman R, et al. (2008) Localization and Interaction of the Proteins Constituting the GAL Genetic Switch in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 7(12):2061-2068 |




