Other names published for STE4: HMD2, YOR212W
STE4 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Other Features
- Strains/Constructs
- Techniques and Reagents
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
STE4 - Strains/Constructs (77)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Fernandez-Pinar P, et al. (2012) The Salmonella Typhimurium effector SteC inhibits Cdc42-mediated signaling through binding to the exchange factor Cdc24 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 23(22):4430-43 | |
| Arlt H, et al. (2011) An overexpression screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies novel genes that affect endocytic protein trafficking. Traffic 12(11):1592-603 | |
| Kim DR, et al. (2011) Differential chromatin proteomics of the MMS-induced DNA damage response in yeast. Proteome Sci 9(1):62 | |
| Martin DC, et al. (2011) New Regulators of a High Affinity Ca2+ Influx System Revealed through a Genome-wide Screen in Yeast. J Biol Chem 286(12):10744-54 | |
| Wang X, et al. (2011) Ste11p MEKK signals through HOG, mating, calcineurin and PKC pathways to regulate the FKS2 gene. BMC Mol Biol 12(1):51 | |
| Zhu M, et al. (2011) Pheromone- and RSP5-dependent ubiquitination of the G protein beta subunit Ste4 in yeast. J Biol Chem 286(31):27147-55 | |
| Bao MZ, et al. (2010) Multisite phosphorylation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae filamentous growth regulator Tec1 is required for its recognition by the E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor Cdc4 and its subsequent destruction in vivo. Eukaryot Cell 9(1):31-6 | |
| Cappell SD, et al. (2010) Systematic analysis of essential genes reveals important regulators of G protein signaling. Mol Cell 38(5):746-57 | |
| Peisajovich SG, et al. (2010) Rapid diversification of cell signaling phenotypes by modular domain recombination. Science 328(5976):368-72 | |
| Pincus D, et al. (2010) Reagents for investigating MAPK signalling in model yeast species. Yeast 27(7):423-30 | |
| Suchkov DV, et al. (2010) Polarization of the yeast pheromone receptor requires its internalization but not actin-dependent secretion. Mol Biol Cell 21(10):1737-52 | |
| Yamamoto K, et al. (2010) Dynamic control of yeast MAP kinase network by induced association and dissociation between the Ste50 scaffold and the Opy2 membrane anchor. Mol Cell 40(1):87-98 | |
| Lang GI, et al. (2009) The cost of gene expression underlies a fitness trade-off in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(14):5755-60 | |
| Liu C, et al. (2009) A genome-wide synthetic dosage lethality screen reveals multiple pathways that require the functioning of ubiquitin-binding proteins Rad23 and Dsk2. BMC Biol 7(1):75 | |
| Tanaka H and Yi TM (2009) Reverse engineering a signaling network using alternative inputs. PLoS One 4(10):e7622 | |
| Tanaka H and Yi TM (2009) Synthetic morphology using alternative inputs. PLoS One 4(9):e6946 | |
| Yang HY, et al. (2009) Glycosylation defects activate filamentous growth Kss1 MAPK and inhibit osmoregulatory Hog1 MAPK. EMBO J 28(10):1380-91 | |
| Niu W, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Revealed by a Systematic and Quantitative Overexpression Screen in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 4(7):e1000120 | |
| Frydlova I, et al. (2007) Special type of pheromone-induced invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 52(2):87-95 | |
| Ingolia NT and Murray AW (2007) Positive-feedback loops as a flexible biological module. Curr Biol 17(8):668-77 | |
| Takahashi S and Pryciak PM (2007) Identification of Novel Membrane-binding Domains in Multiple Yeast Cdc42 Effectors. Mol Biol Cell 18(12):4945-56 | |
| Chasse SA, et al. (2006) Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5(2):330-46 | |
| Flatauer LJ, et al. (2005) Mitogen-activated protein kinases with distinct requirements for Ste5 scaffolding influence signaling specificity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 25(5):1793-803 | |
| Wang Y, et al. (2005) Cdc24 regulates nuclear shuttling and recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold to a heterotrimeric G protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280(13):13084-96 | |
| Winters MJ, et al. (2005) A membrane binding domain in the ste5 scaffold synergizes with gbetagamma binding to control localization and signaling in pheromone response. Mol Cell 20(1):21-32 | |
| Ajit SK and Young KH (2004) Enhancement of pheromone response by RGS9 and Gbeta5 in yeast. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 324(2):686-91 | |
| Andersson J, et al. (2004) Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes. EMBO J 23(13):2564-76 | |
| Bao MZ, et al. (2004) Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119(7):991-1000 | |
| Chasse SA and Dohlman HG (2004) Identification of yeast pheromone pathway modulators by high-throughput agonist response profiling of a yeast gene knockout strain collection. Methods Enzymol 389():399-409 | |
| Flotho A, et al. (2004) Localized feedback phosphorylation of Ste5p scaffold by associated MAPK cascade. J Biol Chem 279(45):47391-401 |





