MEC3/YLR288C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for MEC3: PIP3, PSO9, YLR288C

MEC3 - Strains/Constructs (56)

Results: 1 - 30 of 56 records
   1  2 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Becerra SC, et al.  (2012) Reversibility of replicative senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of homologous recombination and cell cycle checkpoints. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(1):35-45
Yu S, et al.  (2012) Compromised cellular responses to DNA damage accelerate chronological aging by incurring cell wall fragility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Rep 39(4):3573-83
Germann SM, et al.  (2011) Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(2):210-24
Reha-Krantz LJ, et al.  (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24
Reid RJ, et al.  (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3):477-86
Brooks MA, et al.  (2010) Systematic Bioinformatics and Experimental Validation of Yeast Complexes Reduces the Rate of Attrition during Structural Investigations. Structure 18(9):1075-82
Davies AA, et al.  (2010) Ubiquitylation of the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp is independent of rad6-rad18 and DNA damage. Cell 141(6):1080-7
Eichinger CS and Jentsch S  (2010) Synaptonemal complex formation and meiotic checkpoint signaling are linked to the lateral element protein Red1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(25):11370-5
Schmidt KH, et al.  (2010) Defects in DNA lesion bypass lead to spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements and increased cell death. Eukaryot Cell 9(2):315-24
Gomez-Gonzalez B, et al.  (2009) The S-phase checkpoint is required to respond to R-loops accumulated in THO mutants. Mol Cell Biol 29(19):5203-13
Pages V, et al.  (2009) Role of DNA damage-induced replication checkpoint in promoting lesion bypass by translesion synthesis in yeast. Genes Dev 23(12):1438-49
Bonilla CY, et al.  (2008) Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol Cell 30(3):267-76
Cardone JM, et al.  (2008) DNA repair by polymerase delta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not controlled by the proliferating cell nuclear antigen-like Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 complex. Genet Mol Res 7(1):127-32
Razidlo DF and Lahue RS  (2008) Mrc1, Tof1 and Csm3 inhibit CAG.CTG repeat instability by at least two mechanisms. DNA Repair (Amst) 7(4):633-40
Seitomer E, et al.  (2008) Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae null allele strains identifies a larger role for DNA damage versus oxidative stress pathways in growth inhibition by selenium. Mol Nutr Food Res 52(11):1305-15
Grandin N and Charbonneau M  (2007) Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA. Nucleic Acids Res 35(3):822-38
Mitra N and Roeder GS  (2007) A novel nonnull ZIP1 allele triggers meiotic arrest with synapsed chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 176(2):773-87
Bylund GO, et al.  (2006) Overproduction and purification of RFC-related clamp loaders and PCNA-related clamps from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol 409():1-11
Cardone JM, et al.  (2006) Psoralen-sensitive mutant pso9-1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains a mutant allele of the DNA damage checkpoint gene MEC3. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(2):163-71
Ogiwara H, et al.  (2006) Dpb11, the budding yeast homolog of TopBP1, functions with the checkpoint clamp in recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res 34(11):3389-98
Schmidt KH and Kolodner RD  (2006) Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(48):18196-201
Schmidt KH, et al.  (2006) Control of translocations between highly diverged genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the Bloom's syndrome protein. Mol Cell Biol 26(14):5406-20
Grandin N, et al.  (2005) Activation of Mrc1, a mediator of the replication checkpoint, by telomere erosion. Biol Cell 97(10):799-814
Huang ME and Kolodner RD  (2005) A biological network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prevents the deleterious effects of endogenous oxidative DNA damage. Mol Cell 17(5):709-20
Lee W, et al.  (2005) Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet 1(2):e24
Majka J and Burgers PM  (2005) Function of Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 and its partial complexes in the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(10):1189-94
Sabbioneda S, et al.  (2005) The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280(46):38657-65
Baroni E, et al.  (2004) The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 24(10):4151-65
Jia X, et al.  (2004) Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166(2):753-64
Lin J, et al.  (2004) Mutant telomere sequences lead to impaired chromosome separation and a unique checkpoint response. Mol Biol Cell 15(4):1623-34
Results: 1 - 30 of 56 records
   1  2