RAD51/YER095W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for RAD51: MUT5, recombinase RAD51, YER095W

RAD51 - Strains/Constructs (293)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Boiteux S and Guillet M  (2006) Use of yeast for detection of endogenous abasic lesions, their source, and their repair. Methods Enzymol 408:79-91
Branzei D, et al.  (2006) Ubc9- and mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127(3):509-22
Chin JK, et al.  (2006) Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(5):618-28
Fukuda T and Ohya Y  (2006) Recruitment of RecA homologs Dmc1p and Rad51p to the double-strand break repair site initiated by meiosis-specific endonuclease VDE (PI-SceI). Mol Genet Genomics 275(2):204-14
Fung CW, et al.  (2006) The rad51-K191R ATPase-defective mutant is impaired for presynaptic filament formation. Mol Cell Biol 26(24):9544-54
Game JC, et al.  (2006) The RAD6/BRE1 histone modification pathway in Saccharomyces confers radiation resistance through a RAD51-dependent process that is independent of RAD18. Genetics 173(4):1951-68
Henry JM, et al.  (2006) Mnd1/Hop2 facilitates Dmc1-dependent interhomolog crossover formation in meiosis of budding yeast. Mol Cell Biol 26(8):2913-23
Larrivee M and Wellinger RJ  (2006) Telomerase- and capping-independent yeast survivors with alternate telomere states. Nat Cell Biol 8(7):741-7
LeBel C, et al.  (2006) Assessing telomeric phenotypes. Methods Mol Biol 313():265-316
Lui DY, et al.  (2006) Analysis of close stable homolog juxtaposition during meiosis in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 173(3):1207-22
Luke B, et al.  (2006) The cullin Rtt101p promotes replication fork progression through damaged DNA and natural pause sites. Curr Biol 16(8):786-92
Motegi A, et al.  (2006) Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 26(4):1424-33
Ogiwara H, et al.  (2006) Dpb11, the budding yeast homolog of TopBP1, functions with the checkpoint clamp in recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res 34(11):3389-98
Papamichos-Chronakis M, et al.  (2006) Interplay between Ino80 and Swr1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev 20(17):2437-49
Pratt-Hyatt MJ, et al.  (2006) Increased recombination between active tRNA genes. DNA Cell Biol 25(6):359-64
Sacher M, et al.  (2006) Control of Rad52 recombination activity by double-strand break-induced SUMO modification. Nat Cell Biol 8(11):1284-90
Schmidt KH and Kolodner RD  (2006) Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(48):18196-201
Schmidt KH, et al.  (2006) Control of translocations between highly diverged genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the Bloom's syndrome protein. Mol Cell Biol 26(14):5406-20
Seiple L, et al.  (2006) Linking uracil base excision repair and 5-fluorouracil toxicity in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34(1):140-51
Storici F, et al.  (2006) Conservative repair of a chromosomal double-strand break by single-strand DNA through two steps of annealing. Mol Cell Biol 26(20):7645-57
Thorpe PH, et al.  (2006) Cells expressing murine RAD52 splice variants favor sister chromatid repair. Mol Cell Biol 26(10):3752-63
Tounekti K, et al.  (2006) Deletion of the chromatin remodeling gene SPT10 sensitizes yeast cells to a subclass of DNA-damaging agents. Environ Mol Mutagen 47(9):707-17
Tsai HJ, et al.  (2006) Involvement of topoisomerase III in telomere-telomere recombination. J Biol Chem 281(19):13717-23
Valencia-Burton M, et al.  (2006) Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52 and RAD55 mutants. Genetics 174(1):41-55
Van Komen S, et al.  (2006) Purification and Assays of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homologous Recombination Proteins. Methods Enzymol 408:445-63
Wagner M, et al.  (2006) The absence of Top3 reveals an interaction between the Sgs1 and Pif1 DNA helicases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174(2):555-73
Woolstencroft RN, et al.  (2006) Ccr4 contributes to tolerance of replication stress through control of CRT1 mRNA poly(A) tail length. J Cell Sci 119(Pt 24):5178-92
Baldwin EL, et al.  (2005) Mms22p protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae from DNA damage induced by topoisomerase II. Nucleic Acids Res 33(3):1021-30
Bjergbaek L, et al.  (2005) Mechanistically distinct roles for Sgs1p in checkpoint activation and replication fork maintenance. EMBO J 24(2):405-17
Budd ME, et al.  (2005) A network of multi-tasking proteins at the DNA replication fork preserves genome stability. PLoS Genet 1(6):e61