Other names published for MEC1: ESR1, SAD3, RAD31, YBR136W
MEC1 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Other Features
- Strains/Constructs
- Techniques and Reagents
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
MEC1 - Strains/Constructs (283)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Chambers AL, et al. (2012) The two different isoforms of the RSC chromatin remodeling complex play distinct roles in DNA damage responses. PLoS One 7(2):e32016 | |
| Chuang CN, et al. (2012) Mek1 stabilizes Hop1-Thr318 phosphorylation to promote interhomolog recombination and checkpoint responses during yeast meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res 40(22):11416-27 | |
| Collura A, et al. (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9-1-1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(3):294-303 | |
| Cremona CA, et al. (2012) Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45(3):422-32 | |
| Davidson MB, et al. (2012) Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype. EMBO J 31(4):895-907 | |
| Dion V, et al. (2012) Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery.LID - 10.1038/ncb2465 [doi] Nat Cell Biol () | |
| Hashash N, et al. (2012) Topoisomerase II- and Condensin-Dependent Breakage of MEC1(ATR)-Sensitive Fragile Sites Occurs Independently of Spindle Tension, Anaphase, or Cytokinesis. PLoS Genet 8(10):e1002978 | |
| Hector RE, et al. (2012) Mec1p associates with functionally compromised telomeres. Chromosoma 121(3):277-90 | |
| Liang D, et al. (2012) Histone dosage regulates DNA damage sensitivity in a checkpoint-independent manner by the homologous recombination pathway. Nucleic Acids Res 40(19):9604-20 | |
| Manfrini N, et al. (2012) G(1)/S and G(2)/M cyclin-dependent kinase activities commit cells to death in the absence of the S-phase checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 32(24):4971-85 | |
| Poli J, et al. (2012) dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 31(4):883-94 | |
| Silva S, et al. (2012) Live Cell Microscopy of DNA Damage Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 920():433-43 | |
| Soriano-Carot M, et al. (2012) The yeast mitogen-activated protein kinase Slt2 is involved in the cellular response to genotoxic stress. Cell Div 7(1):1 | |
| Srividya I, et al. (2012) Yeast transcription termination factor rtt103 functions in DNA damage response. PLoS One 7(2):e31288 | |
| Tan FJ, et al. (2012) DNA resection at chromosome breaks promotes genome stability by constraining non-allelic homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 8(3):e1002633 | |
| Tittel-Elmer M, et al. (2012) Cohesin association to replication sites depends on rad50 and promotes fork restart. Mol Cell 48(1):98-108 | |
| Tkach JM, et al. (2012) Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 14(9):966-76 | |
| Yu S, et al. (2012) Compromised cellular responses to DNA damage accelerate chronological aging by incurring cell wall fragility in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Rep 39(4):3573-83 | |
| Abba S, et al. (2011) A PLAC8-containing protein from an endomycorrhizal fungus confers cadmium resistance to yeast cells by interacting with Mlh3p. Nucleic Acids Res 39(17):7548-63 | |
| Au TJ, et al. (2011) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity. Mol Cell Biol 31(22):4454-63 | |
| Bermejo R, et al. (2011) The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores. Cell 146(2):233-46 | |
| Chen X, et al. (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation.LID - 10.1038/nsmb.2105 [doi] Nat Struct Mol Biol () | |
| Feng W, et al. (2011) Replication stress-induced chromosome breakage is correlated with replication fork progression and is preceded by single-stranded DNA formation. G3 (Bethesda) 1(5):327-35 | |
| Fukunaga K, et al. (2011) Activation of Protein Kinase Tel1 through Recognition of Protein-Bound DNA Ends. Mol Cell Biol 31(10):1959-71 | |
| Germann SM, et al. (2011) Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(2):210-24 | |
| Hashash N, et al. (2011) Regulation of fragile sites expression in budding yeast by MEC1, RRM3 and hydroxyurea. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 2):181-5 | |
| Ho HC and Burgess SM (2011) Pch2 Acts through Xrs2 and Tel1/ATM to Modulate Interhomolog Bias and Checkpoint Function during Meiosis. PLoS Genet 7(11):e1002351 | |
| Li XC and Tye BK (2011) Ploidy Dictates Repair Pathway Choice under DNA Replication Stress. Genetics 187(4):1031-40 | |
| Minca EC and Kowalski D (2011) Replication fork stalling by bulky DNA damage: localization at active origins and checkpoint modulation. Nucleic Acids Res 39(7):2610-23 | |
| Puddu F, et al. (2011) Sensing of Replication Stress and Mec1 Activation Act through Two Independent Pathways Involving the 9-1-1 Complex and DNA Polymerase epsilon. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1002022 |




