MAD1/YGL086W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for MAD1: YGL086W

MAD1 - Reviews (33)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Potapova TA, et al.  (2013) Aneuploidy and chromosomal instability: a vicious cycle driving cellular evolution and cancer genome chaos. Cancer Metastasis Rev ()
Aitchison JD and Rout MP  (2012) The yeast nuclear pore complex and transport through it. Genetics 190(3):855-83
Burrack LS and Berman J  (2012) Flexibility of centromere and kinetochore structures. Trends Genet 28(5):204-12
Luo X and Yu H  (2012) Mitosis: short-circuiting spindle checkpoint signaling. Curr Biol 22(4):R128-30
Surana U, et al.  (2012) Staging a recovery from mitotic arrest: Unusual ways of Cdk1. Bioarchitecture 2(2):33-37
Silva P, et al.  (2011) Monitoring the fidelity of mitotic chromosome segregation by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Cell Prolif 44(5):391-400
Glynn M, et al.  (2010) Centromeres: assembling and propagating epigenetic function. Subcell Biochem 50():223-49
Zich J and Hardwick KG  (2010) Getting down to the phosphorylated 'nuts and bolts' of spindle checkpoint signalling. Trends Biochem Sci 35(1):18-27
Fuller BG and Stukenberg PT  (2009) Cell division: righting the check. Curr Biol 19(14):R550-3
Suijkerbuijk SJ and Kops GJ  (2008) Preventing aneuploidy: the contribution of mitotic checkpoint proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1786(1):24-31
Wang Y  (2008) Chromosome instability in yeast and its implications to the study of human cancer. Front Biosci 13:2091-102
Banerjee S, et al.  (2007) Suppression of gross chromosomal rearrangements by a new alternative replication factor C complex. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 362(3):546-9
Taddei A  (2007) Active genes at the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19(3):305-310
Yu H  (2006) Structural activation of Mad2 in the mitotic spindle checkpoint: the two-state Mad2 model versus the Mad2 template model. J Cell Biol 173(2):153-7
Kadura S and Sazer S  (2005) SAC-ing mitotic errors: how the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) plays defense against chromosome mis-segregation. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 61(3):145-60
Kline-Smith SL, et al.  (2005) Kinetochore-spindle microtubule interactions during mitosis. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17(1):35-46
Lacefield S and Murray A  (2005) A delay like no other. Nat Genet 37(7):662-3
Nasmyth K  (2005) How do so few control so many? Cell 120(6):739-46
Tan AL, et al.  (2005) Essential tension and constructive destruction: the spindle checkpoint and its regulatory links with mitotic exit. Biochem J 386(Pt 1):1-13
Cleveland DW, et al.  (2003) Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling. Cell 112(4):407-21
Lew DJ and Burke DJ  (2003) The spindle assembly and spindle position checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 37:251-82
Kolodner RD, et al.  (2002) Maintenance of genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 297(5581):552-7
Nasmyth K  (2002) Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science 297(5581):559-65
Adam SA  (2001) The nuclear pore complex. Genome Biol 2(9):REVIEWS0007
Kitagawa K and Hieter P  (2001) Evolutionary conservation between budding yeast and human kinetochores. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2(9):678-87
Wassmann K and Benezra R  (2001) Mitotic checkpoints: from yeast to cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev 11(1):83-90
Cerutti L and Simanis V  (2000) Controlling the end of the cell cycle. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10(1):65-9
Tyers M and Jorgensen P  (2000) Proteolysis and the cell cycle: with this RING I do thee destroy. Curr Opin Genet Dev 10(1):54-64
Chial HJ and Winey M  (1999) Mechanisms of genetic instability revealed by analysis of yeast spindle pole body duplication. Biol Cell 91(6):439-50
Taylor SS  (1999) Chromosome segregation: dual control ensures fidelity. Curr Biol 9(15):R562-4