PRE2/YPR103W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for PRE2: DOA3, PRG1, SRR2, proteasome core particle subunit beta 5, YPR103W

PRE2 - Protein-protein Interactions (19)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Enenkel C  (2012) Using Native Gel Electrophoresis and Phosphofluoroimaging to Analyze GFP-Tagged Proteasomes. Methods Mol Biol 832():339-48
Couttas TA, et al.  (2011) Monitoring cytoplasmic protein complexes with blue native gel electrophoresis and stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture: analysis of changes in the 20S proteasome. Electrophoresis 32(14):1819-23
Gomez TA, et al.  (2011) Identification of a functional docking site in the Rpn1 LRR domain for the UBA-UBL domain protein Ddi1. BMC Biol 9(1):33
Park S, et al.  (2011) Structural defects in the regulatory particle-core particle interface of the proteasome induce a novel proteasome stress response. J Biol Chem 286(42):36652-66
Sakata E, et al.  (2011) The catalytic activity of Ubp6 enhances maturation of the proteasomal regulatory particle. Mol Cell 42(5):637-49
Stadtmueller BM, et al.  (2010) Structural models for interactions between the 20S proteasome and its PAN/19S activators. J Biol Chem 285(1):13-7
Voloshin O, et al.  (2010) Tubulin chaperone E binds microtubules and proteasomes and protects against misfolded protein stress. Cell Mol Life Sci 67(12):2025-38
Le Tallec B, et al.  (2009) Hsm3/S5b participates in the assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. Mol Cell 33(3):389-99
Chen L and Madura K  (2008) Centrin/Cdc31 is a novel regulator of protein degradation. Mol Cell Biol 28(5):1829-40
Betel D, et al.  (2007) Structure-templated predictions of novel protein interactions from sequence information. PLoS Comput Biol 3(9):1783-9
Kleijnen MF, et al.  (2007) Stability of the proteasome can be regulated allosterically through engagement of its proteolytic active sites. Nat Struct Mol Biol 14(12):1180-8
Li X, et al.  (2007) beta-Subunit appendages promote 20S proteasome assembly by overcoming an Ump1-dependent checkpoint. EMBO J 26(9):2339-49
Guerrero C, et al.  (2006) An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach: quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting network. Mol Cell Proteomics 5(2):366-78
Denison C and Kodadek T  (2004) Toward a general chemical method for rapidly mapping multi-protein complexes. J Proteome Res 3(3):417-25
Wohlschlegel JA, et al.  (2004) Global analysis of protein sumoylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 279(44):45662-8
Groll M, et al.  (1999) The catalytic sites of 20S proteasomes and their role in subunit maturation: a mutational and crystallographic study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(20):10976-83
Papa FR, et al.  (1999) Interaction of the Doa4 deubiquitinating enzyme with the yeast 26S proteasome. Mol Biol Cell 10(3):741-56
Nussbaum AK, et al.  (1998) Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome beta subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(21):12504-9
Chen P and Hochstrasser M  (1996) Autocatalytic subunit processing couples active site formation in the 20S proteasome to completion of assembly. Cell 86(6):961-72