STE5/YDR103W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for STE5: HMD3, NUL3, YDR103W

STE5 - Protein-protein Interactions (23)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Zalatan JG, et al.  (2012) Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science 337(6099):1218-22
Bhaduri S and Pryciak PM  (2011) Cyclin-specific docking motifs promote phosphorylation of yeast signaling proteins by G1/S Cdk complexes. Curr Biol 21(19):1615-23
Malleshaiah MK, et al.  (2010) The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature 465(7294):101-5
Mittag T, et al.  (2010) Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition. J Mol Recognit 23(2):105-16
Good M, et al.  (2009) The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell 136(6):1085-97
Kim J, et al.  (2008) Recognition of non-canonical peptides by the yeast Fus1p SH3 domain: elucidation of a common mechanism for diverse SH3 domain specificities. J Mol Biol 377(3):889-901
Maeder CI, et al.  (2007) Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling. Nat Cell Biol 9(11):1319-1326
Slaughter BD, et al.  (2007) Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(51):20320-5
Bhattacharyya RP, et al.  (2006) The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311(5762):822-6
Garrenton LS, et al.  (2006) Function of the MAPK scaffold protein, Ste5, requires a cryptic PH domain. Genes Dev 20(14):1946-58
Titz B, et al.  (2006) Transcriptional activators in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34(3):955-67
Qi M and Elion EA  (2005) Formin-induced actin cables are required for polarized recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold and high level activation of MAPK Fus3. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 13):2837-48
Kusari AB, et al.  (2004) A conserved protein interaction network involving the yeast MAP kinases Fus3 and Kss1. J Cell Biol 164(2):267-77
Maleri S, et al.  (2004) Persistent activation by constitutive Ste7 promotes Kss1-mediated invasive growth but fails to support Fus3-dependent mating in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24(20):9221-38
Park SH, et al.  (2003) Rewiring MAP kinase pathways using alternative scaffold assembly mechanisms. Science 299(5609):1061-4
Wang Y and Elion EA  (2003) Nuclear export and plasma membrane recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold are coordinated with oligomerization and association with signal transduction components. Mol Biol Cell 14(6):2543-58
Bardwell AJ, et al.  (2001) A conserved docking site in MEKs mediates high-affinity binding to MAP kinases and cooperates with a scaffold protein to enhance signal transmission. J Biol Chem 276(13):10374-86
van Drogen F, et al.  (2001) MAP kinase dynamics in response to pheromones in budding yeast. Nat Cell Biol 3(12):1051-9
Sette C, et al.  (2000) Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):4033-49
Choi KY, et al.  (1999) Characterization of Fus3 localization: active Fus3 localizes in complexes of varying size and specific activity. Mol Biol Cell 10(5):1553-68
Wu C, et al.  (1999) Functional characterization of the interaction of Ste50p with Ste11p MAPKKK in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10(7):2425-40
Caponigro G, et al.  (1998) Transdominant genetic analysis of a growth control pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(13):7508-13
Dowell SJ, et al.  (1998) Mapping of a yeast G protein betagamma signaling interaction. Genetics 150(4):1407-17