RAD53/YPL153C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for RAD53: LSD1, MEC2, SPK1, YPL153C

RAD53 - Protein Processing/Modification/Regulation (203)

Results: 1 - 30 of 203 records
   1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Berens TJ and Toczyski DP  (2012) Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 23(6):1058-67
Castellano-Pozo M, et al.  (2012) R-loops cause replication impairment and genome instability during meiosis. EMBO Rep 13(10):923-9
Davidson MB, et al.  (2012) Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype. EMBO J 31(4):895-907
Fukunaga K, et al.  (2012) Subtelomere-binding protein Tbf1 and telomere-binding protein Rap1 collaborate to inhibit localization of the Mre11 complex to DNA ends in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 23(2):347-59
Lazzaro F, et al.  (2012) RNase H and postreplication repair protect cells from ribonucleotides incorporated in DNA. Mol Cell 45(1):99-110
Srividya I, et al.  (2012) Yeast transcription termination factor rtt103 functions in DNA damage response. PLoS One 7(2):e31288
Tkach JM, et al.  (2012) Dissecting DNA damage response pathways by analysing protein localization and abundance changes during DNA replication stress. Nat Cell Biol 14(9):966-76
Wang G, et al.  (2012) Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 11(20)
Wang G, et al.  (2012) Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 11(20):3792-800
Ward TA, et al.  (2012) Components of a fanconi-like pathway control pso2-independent DNA interstrand crosslink repair in yeast. PLoS Genet 8(8):e1002884
Wurtele H, et al.  (2012) Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation and the response to DNA replication fork damage. Mol Cell Biol 32(1):154-72
van Deursen F, et al.  (2012) Mcm10 associates with the loaded DNA helicase at replication origins and defines a novel step in its activation. EMBO J 31(9):2195-206
Clemente-Ruiz M, et al.  (2011) Histone H3K56 acetylation, CAF1, and Rtt106 coordinate nucleosome assembly and stability of advancing replication forks. PLoS Genet 7(11):e1002376
Duch A, et al.  (2011) A Dbf4 Mutant Contributes to Bypassing the Rad53-mediated Block of Origins of Replication in Response to Genotoxic Stress. J Biol Chem 286(4):2486-91
Dyavaiah M, et al.  (2011) Autophagy-Dependent Regulation of the DNA Damage Response Protein Ribonucleotide Reductase 1. Mol Cancer Res 9(4):462-475
Engels K, et al.  (2011) 14-3-3 proteins regulate exonuclease 1-dependent processing of stalled replication forks. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1001367
Kubota T, et al.  (2011) Quantitative proteomic analysis of chromatin reveals that Ctf18 acts in the DNA replication checkpoint. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(7):M110.005561
Lee MT, et al.  (2011) The SUMO Isopeptidase Ulp2p Is Required to Prevent Recombination-Induced Chromosome Segregation Lethality following DNA Replication Stress. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1001355
Leon Ortiz AM, et al.  (2011) Srs2 overexpression reveals a helicase-independent role at replication forks that requires diverse cell functions. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(5):506-17
Minard LV, et al.  (2011) SWI/SNF and Asf1 Independently Promote Derepression of the DNA Damage Response Genes under Conditions of Replication Stress. PLoS One 6(6):e21633
Minard LV, et al.  (2011) Transcriptional Regulation by Asf1: NEW MECHANISTIC INSIGHTS FROM STUDIES OF THE DNA DAMAGE RESPONSE TO REPLICATION STRESS. J Biol Chem 286(9):7082-92
Navadgi-Patil VM, et al.  (2011) The unstructured C-terminal tail of yeast Dpb11 (human TopBP1) protein is dispensable for DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint but required for the G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem 286(47):40999-1007
Puddu F, et al.  (2011) Sensing of Replication Stress and Mec1 Activation Act through Two Independent Pathways Involving the 9-1-1 Complex and DNA Polymerase epsilon. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1002022
Rai R, et al.  (2011) Small Ubiquitin-related Modifier Ligase Activity of Mms21 Is Required for Maintenance of Chromosome Integrity during the Unperturbed Mitotic Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 286(16):14516-30
Reha-Krantz LJ, et al.  (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24
Robert T, et al.  (2011) HDACs link the DNA damage response, processing of double-strand breaks and autophagy. Nature 471(7336):74-9
Smith JS, et al.  (2011) Rudimentary G-quadruplex-based telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18(4):478-85
Sundararajan R and Freudenreich CH  (2011) Expanded CAG/CTG Repeat DNA Induces a Checkpoint Response That Impacts Cell Proliferation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1001339
Yeung M and Durocher D  (2011) Srs2 enables checkpoint recovery by promoting disassembly of DNA damage foci from chromatin. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(12):1213-22
Bazzi M, et al.  (2010) Dephosphorylation of {gamma}H2A by Glc7/Protein Phosphatase 1 Promotes Recovery from Inhibition of DNA Replication. Mol Cell Biol 30(1):131-45
Results: 1 - 30 of 203 records
   1  2  3  4  5  6  7