Other names published for FUS3: DAC2, YBL016W
FUS3 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Protein Physical Properties
- Protein Processing/Modification/Regulation
- Protein Sequence Features
- Protein-Nucleic Acid Interactions
- Protein-protein Interactions
- Protein/Nucleic Acid Structure
- Substrates/Ligands/Cofactors
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
FUS3 - Protein Processing/Modification/Regulation (39)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Fernandez-Pinar P, et al. (2012) The Salmonella Typhimurium effector SteC inhibits Cdc42-mediated signaling through binding to the exchange factor Cdc24 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 23(22):4430-43 | |
| Hao N, et al. (2012) Combined computational and experimental analysis reveals mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated feedback phosphorylation as a mechanism for signaling specificity. Mol Biol Cell 23(19):3899-910 | |
| Tanigawa M, et al. (2012) Sphingolipids regulate the yeast high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 32(14):2861-70 | |
| Zalatan JG, et al. (2012) Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science 337(6099):1218-22 | |
| Bruckner S, et al. (2011) The TEA transcription factor Tec1 links TOR and MAPK pathways to coordinate yeast development. Genetics 189(2):479-94 | |
| Cappell SD and Dohlman HG (2011) Selective Regulation of MAP Kinase Signaling by an Endomembrane Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase. J Biol Chem 286(17):14852-60 | |
| Cappell SD, et al. (2010) Systematic analysis of essential genes reveals important regulators of G protein signaling. Mol Cell 38(5):746-57 | |
| Chen RE, et al. (2010) Dynamic localization of fus3 mitogen-activated protein kinase is necessary to evoke appropriate responses and avoid cytotoxic effects. Mol Cell Biol 30(17):4293-307 | |
| Saleem RA, et al. (2010) Integrated phosphoproteomics analysis of a signaling network governing nutrient response and peroxisome induction. Mol Cell Proteomics 9(9):2076-88 | |
| de Llanos R, et al. (2010) Differences in activation of MAP kinases and variability in the polyglutamine tract of Slt2 in clinical and non-clinical isolates of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 27(8):549-61 | |
| Chapman SA and Asthagiri AR (2009) Quantitative effect of scaffold abundance on signal propagation. Mol Syst Biol 5():313 | |
| Good M, et al. (2009) The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell 136(6):1085-97 | |
| Hilioti Z, et al. (2008) Oscillatory Phosphorylation of Yeast Fus3 MAP Kinase Controls Periodic Gene Expression and Morphogenesis. Curr Biol 18(21):1700-6 | |
| Hur JY, et al. (2008) Quantitative Profiling of Dual Phosphorylation of Fus3 MAP Kinase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cells 26(1):41-7 | |
| Mandal AK, et al. (2008) Ydj1 protects nascent protein kinases from degradation and controls the rate of their maturation. Mol Cell Biol 28(13):4434-44 | |
| Wang Y, et al. (2008) Down-regulation of Pkc1-mediated Signaling by the Deubiquitinating Enzyme Ubp3. J Biol Chem 283(4):1954-61 | |
| Yu RC, et al. (2008) Negative feedback that improves information transmission in yeast signalling. Nature 456(7223):755-61 | |
| Blackwell E, et al. (2007) The pheromone-induced nuclear accumulation of the Fus3 MAPK in yeast depends on its phosphorylation state and on Dig1 and Dig2. BMC Cell Biol 8:44 | |
| Maeder CI, et al. (2007) Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling. Nat Cell Biol 9(11):1319-1326 | |
| Mandal AK, et al. (2007) Cdc37 has distinct roles in protein kinase quality control that protect nascent chains from degradation and promote posttranslational maturation. J Cell Biol 176(3):319-28 | |
| Bhattacharyya RP, et al. (2006) The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311(5762):822-6 | |
| Chasse SA, et al. (2006) Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5(2):330-46 | |
| Cherkasova VA (2006) Measuring MAP kinase activity in immune complex assays. Methods 40(3):234-42 | |
| Schwartz MA and Madhani HD (2006) Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5. Curr Genet 49(6):351-63 | |
| Slessareva JE, et al. (2006) Activation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase Vps34 by a G protein alpha subunit at the endosome. Cell 126(1):191-203 | |
| Wang X, et al. (2006) Bistability, stochasticity, and oscillations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. Biophys J 90(6):1961-78 | |
| Gruhler A, et al. (2005) Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol Cell Proteomics 4(3):310-27 | |
| Qi M and Elion EA (2005) Formin-induced actin cables are required for polarized recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold and high level activation of MAPK Fus3. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 13):2837-48 | |
| Andersson J, et al. (2004) Differential input by Ste5 scaffold and Msg5 phosphatase route a MAPK cascade to multiple outcomes. EMBO J 23(13):2564-76 | |
| Chou S, et al. (2004) Fus3-regulated Tec1 degradation through SCFCdc4 determines MAPK signaling specificity during mating in yeast. Cell 119(7):981-90 |





