Other names published for STE5: HMD3, NUL3, YDR103W
STE5 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Additional Literature
- All Curated References
- Primary Literature
- Reviews
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
STE5 - Primary Literature (58)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Bush A and Colman-Lerner A (2013) Quantitative measurement of protein relocalization in live cells. Biophys J 104(3):727-36 | |
| Yerko V, et al. (2013) Structurally unique interaction of RBD-like and PH domains is crucial for yeast pheromone signaling. Mol Biol Cell 24(3):409-20 | |
| Bhunia A, et al. (2012) Structural determinants of the specificity of a membrane binding domain of the scaffold protein Ste5 of budding yeast: Implications in signaling by the scaffold protein in MAPK pathway. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818(5):1250-60 | |
| Strickland D, et al. (2012) TULIPs: tunable, light-controlled interacting protein tags for cell biology.LID - 10.1038/nmeth.1904 [doi] Nat Methods () | |
| Zalatan JG, et al. (2012) Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science 337(6099):1218-22 | |
| Bhaduri S and Pryciak PM (2011) Cyclin-specific docking motifs promote phosphorylation of yeast signaling proteins by G1/S Cdk complexes. Curr Biol 21(19):1615-23 | |
| Doncic A, et al. (2011) Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. Mol Cell 43(4):528-39 | |
| Martin DC, et al. (2011) New Regulators of a High Affinity Ca2+ Influx System Revealed through a Genome-wide Screen in Yeast. J Biol Chem 286(12):10744-54 | |
| Thomson TM, et al. (2011) Scaffold number in yeast signaling system sets tradeoff between system output and dynamic range. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(50):20265-70 | |
| Villasmil ML, et al. (2011) The Putative Lipid Transporter, Arv1, Is Required for Activating Pheromone-Induced MAP Kinase Signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 187(2):455-65 | |
| Chavel CA, et al. (2010) Multiple signals converge on a differentiation MAPK pathway. PLoS Genet 6(3):e1000883 | |
| Lopez-Garcia B, et al. (2010) A genomic approach highlights common and diverse effects and determinants of susceptibility on the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to distinct antimicrobial peptides. BMC Microbiol 10():289 | |
| Malleshaiah MK, et al. (2010) The scaffold protein Ste5 directly controls a switch-like mating decision in yeast. Nature 465(7294):101-5 | |
| Mittag T, et al. (2010) Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition. J Mol Recognit 23(2):105-16 | |
| Yamamoto K, et al. (2010) Dynamic control of yeast MAP kinase network by induced association and dissociation between the Ste50 scaffold and the Opy2 membrane anchor. Mol Cell 40(1):87-98 | |
| Chapman SA and Asthagiri AR (2009) Quantitative effect of scaffold abundance on signal propagation. Mol Syst Biol 5():313 | |
| Garrenton LS, et al. (2009) Nucleus-specific and cell cycle-regulated degradation of mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold protein Ste5 contributes to the control of signaling competence. Mol Cell Biol 29(2):582-601 | |
| Good M, et al. (2009) The Ste5 scaffold directs mating signaling by catalytically unlocking the Fus3 MAP kinase for activation. Cell 136(6):1085-97 | |
| Lang GI, et al. (2009) The cost of gene expression underlies a fitness trade-off in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(14):5755-60 | |
| Mazor Y and Kupiec M (2009) Developmentally regulated MAPK pathways modulate heterochromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 37(14):4839-49 | |
| Tanaka H and Yi TM (2009) Synthetic morphology using alternative inputs. PLoS One 4(9):e6946 | |
| Bashor CJ, et al. (2008) Using engineered scaffold interactions to reshape MAP kinase pathway signaling dynamics. Science 319(5869):1539-43 | |
| Hao N, et al. (2008) Regulation of cell signaling dynamics by the protein kinase-scaffold Ste5. Mol Cell 30(5):649-56 | |
| Strickfaden SC and Pryciak PM (2008) Distinct Roles for Two G{alpha} G Interfaces in Cell Polarity Control by a Yeast Heterotrimeric G Protein. Mol Biol Cell 19(1):181-97 | |
| Yu L, et al. (2008) Counteractive Control of Polarized Morphogenesis during Mating by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Fus3 and G1 Cyclin-dependent Kinase. Mol Biol Cell 19(4):1739-52 | |
| Maeder CI, et al. (2007) Spatial regulation of Fus3 MAP kinase activity through a reaction-diffusion mechanism in yeast pheromone signalling. Nat Cell Biol 9(11):1319-1326 | |
| Slaughter BD, et al. (2007) Mapping dynamic protein interactions in MAP kinase signaling using live-cell fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy and imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(51):20320-5 | |
| Strickfaden SC, et al. (2007) A mechanism for cell-cycle regulation of MAP kinase signaling in a yeast differentiation pathway. Cell 128(3):519-31 | |
| Bhattacharyya RP, et al. (2006) The Ste5 scaffold allosterically modulates signaling output of the yeast mating pathway. Science 311(5762):822-6 | |
| Chasse SA, et al. (2006) Genome-scale analysis reveals Sst2 as the principal regulator of mating pheromone signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5(2):330-46 |





