Other names published for SML1: YML058W
SML1 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Additional Information
SML1 - Mutants/Phenotypes (127)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Anand RP, et al. (2012) Overcoming natural replication barriers: differential helicase requirements. Nucleic Acids Res 40(3):1091-105 | |
| Baek IJ, et al. (2012) Cadmium inhibits the protein degradation of Sml1 by inhibiting the phosphorylation of Sml1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 424(3):385-90 | |
| Chuang CN, et al. (2012) Mek1 stabilizes Hop1-Thr318 phosphorylation to promote interhomolog recombination and checkpoint responses during yeast meiosis. Nucleic Acids Res 40(22):11416-27 | |
| Collura A, et al. (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9-1-1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(3):294-303 | |
| Crider DG, et al. (2012) Rad53 is essential for a mitochondrial DNA inheritance checkpoint regulating G1 to S progression. J Cell Biol 198(5):793-8 | |
| Davidson MB, et al. (2012) Endogenous DNA replication stress results in expansion of dNTP pools and a mutator phenotype. EMBO J 31(4):895-907 | |
| Dion V, et al. (2012) Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery.LID - 10.1038/ncb2465 [doi] Nat Cell Biol () | |
| Douglas AC, et al. (2012) Functional analysis with a barcoder yeast gene overexpression system. G3 (Bethesda) 2(10):1279-89 | |
| Liang D, et al. (2012) Histone dosage regulates DNA damage sensitivity in a checkpoint-independent manner by the homologous recombination pathway. Nucleic Acids Res 40(19):9604-20 | |
| Manfrini N, et al. (2012) G(1)/S and G(2)/M cyclin-dependent kinase activities commit cells to death in the absence of the S-phase checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 32(24):4971-85 | |
| Poli J, et al. (2012) dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 31(4):883-94 | |
| Ribaud V, et al. (2012) DNA-end capping by the budding yeast transcription factor and subtelomeric binding protein Tbf1. EMBO J 31(1):138-49 | |
| Tan FJ, et al. (2012) DNA resection at chromosome breaks promotes genome stability by constraining non-allelic homologous recombination. PLoS Genet 8(3):e1002633 | |
| Tittel-Elmer M, et al. (2012) Cohesin association to replication sites depends on rad50 and promotes fork restart. Mol Cell 48(1):98-108 | |
| Travesa A, et al. (2012) DNA replication stress differentially regulates G1/S genes via Rad53-dependent inactivation of Nrm1. EMBO J 31(7):1811-22 | |
| Wang G, et al. (2012) Multiple phosphorylation of Rad9 by CDK is required for DNA damage checkpoint activation. Cell Cycle 11(20):3792-800 | |
| Abba S, et al. (2011) A PLAC8-containing protein from an endomycorrhizal fungus confers cadmium resistance to yeast cells by interacting with Mlh3p. Nucleic Acids Res 39(17):7548-63 | |
| Au TJ, et al. (2011) ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity. Mol Cell Biol 31(22):4454-63 | |
| Chen X, et al. (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation.LID - 10.1038/nsmb.2105 [doi] Nat Struct Mol Biol () | |
| Deem A, et al. (2011) Break-induced replication is highly inaccurate. PLoS Biol 9(2):e1000594 | |
| Dosil M (2011) Ribosome synthesis-unrelated functions of the preribosomal factor Rrp12 in cell cycle progression and the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 31(12):2422-38 | |
| Gangavarapu V, et al. (2011) Requirement of replication checkpoint protein kinases mec1/rad53 for postreplication repair in yeast.LID - 10.1128/mBio.00079-11 [doi]LID - e00079-11 [pii] MBio 2(3) | |
| Germann SM, et al. (2011) Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(2):210-24 | |
| Hashash N, et al. (2011) Regulation of fragile sites expression in budding yeast by MEC1, RRM3 and hydroxyurea. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 2):181-5 | |
| Houseley J and Tollervey D (2011) Repeat expansion in the budding yeast ribosomal DNA can occur independently of the canonical homologous recombination machinery. Nucleic Acids Res 39(20):8778-91 | |
| Kim E and Siede W (2011) Phenotypes associated with Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hug1 protein, a putative negative regulator of dNTP Levels, reveal similarities and differences with sequence-related dif1. J Microbiol 49(1):78-85 | |
| Kozhina TN, et al. (2011) [Gene RAD31 is identical to gene MEC1 of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae]. Genetika 47(5):610-4 | |
| Mantiero D, et al. (2011) Limiting replication initiation factors execute the temporal programme of origin firing in budding yeast.LID - 10.1038/emboj.2011.404 [doi] EMBO J () | |
| Refolio E, et al. (2011) The Ddc2/ATRIP checkpoint protein monitors meiotic recombination intermediates. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 14):2488-500 | |
| Reha-Krantz LJ, et al. (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24 |




