RAD24/YER173W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for RAD24: RS1, YER173W

RAD24 - Mutants/Phenotypes (123)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Becerra SC, et al.  (2012) Reversibility of replicative senescence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effect of homologous recombination and cell cycle checkpoints. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(1):35-45
Collura A, et al.  (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9-1-1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(3):294-303
Costelloe T, et al.  (2012) The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489(7417):581-4
Paschini M, et al.  (2012) A naturally thermolabile activity compromises genetic analysis of telomere function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 191(1):79-93
Poli J, et al.  (2012) dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 31(4):883-94
Todorova T, et al.  (2012) Mutagenic effect of freezing on nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 29(5):191-9
Addinall SG, et al.  (2011) Quantitative Fitness Analysis Shows That NMD Proteins and Many Other Protein Complexes Suppress or Enhance Distinct Telomere Cap Defects. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1001362
Alabrudzinska M, et al.  (2011) Dipoid-Specific Genome Stability Genes of S. cerevisiae: Genomic Screen Reveals Haploidization as an Escape from Persisting DNA Rearrangement Stress. PLoS One 6(6):e21124
Deshpande AM, et al.  (2011) Polymerase epsilon is required to maintain replicative senescence. Mol Cell Biol 31(8):1637-45
Diaz de la Loza MD, et al.  (2011) Zim17/Tim15 links mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster biosynthesis to nuclear genome stability. Nucleic Acids Res 39(14):6002-15
Furukawa K, et al.  (2011) Efficient Construction of Homozygous Diploid Strains Identifies Genes Required for the Hyper-Filamentous Phenotype in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS One 6(10):e26584
Gellon L, et al.  (2011) New Functions of Ctf18-RFC in Preserving Genome Stability outside Its Role in Sister Chromatid Cohesion. PLoS Genet 7(2):e1001298
Germann SM, et al.  (2011) Dpb11/TopBP1 plays distinct roles in DNA replication, checkpoint response and homologous recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(2):210-24
Hashash N, et al.  (2011) Regulation of fragile sites expression in budding yeast by MEC1, RRM3 and hydroxyurea. J Cell Sci 124(Pt 2):181-5
Lai YJ, et al.  (2011) Genetic requirements and meiotic function of phosphorylation of the yeast axial element protein red1. Mol Cell Biol 31(5):912-23
Nolt JK, et al.  (2011) PP2A (Cdc)55 is required for multiple events during meiosis I. Cell Cycle 10(9):1420-34
Rai R, et al.  (2011) Small Ubiquitin-related Modifier Ligase Activity of Mms21 Is Required for Maintenance of Chromosome Integrity during the Unperturbed Mitotic Cell Division Cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 286(16):14516-30
Reha-Krantz LJ, et al.  (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24
Reid RJ, et al.  (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3):477-86
Smith JS, et al.  (2011) Rudimentary G-quadruplex-based telomere capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Struct Mol Biol 18(4):478-85
Svensson JP, et al.  (2011) Genomic phenotyping of the essential and non-essential yeast genome detects novel pathways for alkylation resistance. BMC Syst Biol 5(1):157
Xue Y, et al.  (2011) A Novel Checkpoint and RPA Inhibitory Pathway Regulated by Rif1. PLoS Genet 7(12):e1002417
Crabbe L, et al.  (2010) Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(11):1391-1397
Janke R, et al.  (2010) A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 38(7):2302-13
Kaochar S, et al.  (2010) Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(50):21605-10
Murakami-Sekimata A, et al.  (2010) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 9(7):824-34
Panico ER, et al.  (2010) Genetic evidence for a role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mph1 in recombinational DNA repair under replicative stress. Yeast 27(1):11-27
Theis JF, et al.  (2010) The DNA Damage Response Pathway Contributes to the Stability of Chromosome III Derivatives Lacking Efficient Replicators. PLoS Genet 6(12):e1001227
Al-Moghrabi NM, et al.  (2009) The RAD9-dependent gene trans-activation is required for excision repair of active genes but not for repair of non-transcribed DNA. Mutat Res 663(1-2):60-8
Enserink JM, et al.  (2009) Cdc28/Cdk1 positively and negatively affects genome stability in S. cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 185(3):423-37