Other names published for MAD3: YJL013C
MAD3 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Additional Information
MAD3 - Mutants/Phenotypes (39)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Lau DT and Murray AW (2012) Mad2 and Mad3 cooperate to arrest budding yeast in mitosis. Curr Biol 22(3):180-90 | |
| Matson DR, et al. (2012) A conserved role for COMA/CENP-H/I/N kinetochore proteins in the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 26(6):542-7 | |
| Wilmes A, et al. (2012) Chemical genetic profiling of the microtubule-targeting agent peloruside A in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene 497(2):140-6 | |
| Barnhart EL, et al. (2011) Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 22(14):2448-57 | |
| Tsuchiya D, et al. (2011) The spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 regulates APC/C activity during prometaphase and metaphase of meiosis I in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 22(16):2848-61 | |
| Dotiwala F, et al. (2010) Mad2 Prolongs DNA Damage Checkpoint Arrest Caused by a Double-Strand Break via a Centromere-Dependent Mechanism. Curr Biol 20(4):328-332 | |
| Newnham L, et al. (2010) The synaptonemal complex protein, Zip1, promotes the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes at meiosis I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(2):781-5 | |
| Rossio V, et al. (2010) The RSC chromatin-remodeling complex influences mitotic exit and adaptation to the spindle assembly checkpoint by controlling the Cdc14 phosphatase. J Cell Biol 191(5):981-97 | |
| Steinbruck L, et al. (2010) Effects of artesunate on cytokinesis and g2/m cell cycle progression of tumour cells and budding yeast. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 7(6):337-46 | |
| Theis JF, et al. (2010) The DNA Damage Response Pathway Contributes to the Stability of Chromosome III Derivatives Lacking Efficient Replicators. PLoS Genet 6(12):e1001227 | |
| Chiroli E, et al. (2009) Cdc14 inhibition by the spindle assembly checkpoint prevents unscheduled centrosome separation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 20(10):2626-37 | |
| Doncic A, et al. (2009) Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS One 4(8):e6495 | |
| Ng TM, et al. (2009) Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation. Mol Biol Cell 20(17):3818-27 | |
| Amaro IA, et al. (2008) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of p24 Is Essential for Maintaining the Association of p150Glued With the Dynactin Complex. Genetics 178(2):703-9 | |
| Kim EM and Burke DJ (2008) DNA damage activates the SAC in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner, independently of the kinetochore. PLoS Genet 4(2):e1000015 | |
| Burton JL and Solomon MJ (2007) Mad3p, a pseudosubstrate inhibitor of APCCdc20 in the spindle assembly checkpoint. Genes Dev 21(6):655-67 | |
| King EM, et al. (2007) Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores. Genes Dev 21(10):1163-8 | |
| King EM, et al. (2007) Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS One 2(4):e342 | |
| Cheslock PS, et al. (2005) The roles of MAD1, MAD2 and MAD3 in meiotic progression and the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes. Nat Genet 37(7):756-60 | |
| Dorer RK, et al. (2005) A small-molecule inhibitor of Mps1 blocks the spindle-checkpoint response to a lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Curr Biol 15(11):1070-6 | |
| Pathak R, et al. (2005) A role for KEM1 at the START of the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48(5):300-9 | |
| Rancati G, et al. (2005) Mad3/BubR1 phosphorylation during spindle checkpoint activation depends on both Polo and Aurora kinases in budding yeast. Cell Cycle 4(7):972-80 | |
| Bogomolnaya LM, et al. (2004) Hym1p affects cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 46(4):183-92 | |
| Lee MS and Spencer FA (2004) Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(29):10655-60 | |
| Myung K, et al. (2004) Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(45):15980-5 | |
| Abruzzi KC, et al. (2002) An alpha-tubulin mutant demonstrates distinguishable functions among the spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161(3):983-94 | |
| Warren CD, et al. (2002) Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol Biol Cell 13(9):3029-41 | |
| Myung K, et al. (2001) Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104(3):397-408 | |
| Brady DM and Hardwick KG (2000) Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr Biol 10(11):675-8 | |
| Hardwick KG, et al. (2000) MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J Cell Biol 148(5):871-82 |




