SGO1/YOR073W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for SGO1: YOR29-24, YOR073W

SGO1 - Mutants/Phenotypes (28)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Haase J, et al.  (2012) Bub1 kinase and Sgo1 modulate pericentric chromatin in response to altered microtubule dynamics. Curr Biol 22(6):471-81
Jin F, et al.  (2012) Loss of function of the cik1/kar3 motor complex results in chromosomes with syntelic attachment that are sensed by the tension checkpoint. PLoS Genet 8(2):e1002492
Bizzari F and Marston AL  (2011) Cdc55 coordinates spindle assembly and chromosome disjunction during meiosis. J Cell Biol 193(7):1213-28
Kawashima S, et al.  (2011) Global analysis of core histones reveals nucleosomal surfaces required for chromosome bi-orientation.LID - 10.1038/emboj.2011.241 [doi] EMBO J ()
Storchova Z, et al.  (2011) Bub1, Sgo1, and Mps1 mediate a distinct pathway for chromosome biorientation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 22(9):1473-85
Luo J, et al.  (2010) Histone h3 exerts a key function in mitotic checkpoint control. Mol Cell Biol 30(2):537-49
Clift D, et al.  (2009) Shugoshin prevents cohesin cleavage by PP2A(Cdc55)-dependent inhibition of separase. Genes Dev 23(6):766-80
Doncic A, et al.  (2009) Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS One 4(8):e6495
Harrison BD, et al.  (2009) Persistent mechanical linkage between sister chromatids throughout anaphase. Chromosoma 118(5):633-45
Ikui AE and Cross FR  (2009) Specific genetic interactions between spindle assembly checkpoint proteins and B-Type cyclins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 183(1):51-61
Macy B, et al.  (2009) The many faces of shugoshin, the "guardian spirit," in chromosome segregation. Cell Cycle 8(1):35-7
Xu Z, et al.  (2009) Structure and function of the PP2A-shugoshin interaction. Mol Cell 35(4):426-41
Kiburz BM, et al.  (2008) Shugoshin Promotes Sister Kinetochore Biorientation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 19(3):1199-209
Liu H, et al.  (2008) The coordination of centromere replication, spindle formation, and kinetochore-microtubule interaction in budding yeast. PLoS Genet 4(11):e1000262
Alvaro D, et al.  (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet 3(12):e228
Fernius J and Hardwick KG  (2007) Bub1 kinase targets Sgo1 to ensure efficient chromosome biorientation in budding yeast mitosis. PLoS Genet 3(11):e213
Indjeian VB and Murray AW  (2007) Budding yeast mitotic chromosomes have an intrinsic bias to biorient on the spindle. Curr Biol 17(21):1837-46
Lockshon D, et al.  (2007) The sensitivity of yeast mutants to oleic Acid implicates the peroxisome and other processes in membrane function. Genetics 175(1):77-91
Yu HG and Koshland D  (2007) The Aurora kinase Ipl1 maintains the centromeric localization of PP2A to protect cohesin during meiosis. J Cell Biol 176(7):911-8
Brar GA, et al.  (2006) Rec8 phosphorylation and recombination promote the step-wise loss of cohesins in meiosis. Nature 441(7092):532-6
Riedel CG, et al.  (2006) Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature 441(7089):53-61
Indjeian VB, et al.  (2005) The centromeric protein Sgo1 is required to sense lack of tension on mitotic chromosomes. Science 307(5706):130-3
Kiburz BM, et al.  (2005) The core centromere and Sgo1 establish a 50-kb cohesin-protected domain around centromeres during meiosis I. Genes Dev 19(24):3017-30
Katis VL, et al.  (2004) Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore-associated protein related to MEI-S332. Curr Biol 14(7):560-72
Kitajima TS, et al.  (2004) The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature 427(6974):510-7
Lee BH, et al.  (2004) Spo13 maintains centromeric cohesion and kinetochore coorientation during meiosis I. Curr Biol 14(24):2168-82
Marston AL, et al.  (2004) A genome-wide screen identifies genes required for centromeric cohesion. Science 303(5662):1367-70
Dimmer KS, et al.  (2002) Genetic basis of mitochondrial function and morphology in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 13(3):847-53