MUS81/YDR386W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for MUS81: SLX3, YDR386W

MUS81 - Mutants/Phenotypes (77)

Results: 31 - 60 of 77 records
   1  2  3 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Ruiz JF, et al.  (2009) Chromosomal translocations caused by either pol32-dependent or pol32-independent triparental break-induced replication. Mol Cell Biol 29(20):5441-54
Scheifele LZ, et al.  (2009) Retrotransposon overdose and genome integrity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106(33):13927-32
Smith CE, et al.  (2009) Aberrant double-strand break repair resulting in half crossovers in mutants defective for Rad51 or the DNA polymerase delta complex. Mol Cell Biol 29(6):1432-41
Cote AG and Lewis SM  (2008) Mus81-dependent double-strand DNA breaks at in vivo-generated cruciform structures in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 31(6):800-12
Jessop L and Lichten M  (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31(3):313-23
Lyndaker AM, et al.  (2008) Mutants Defective in Rad1-Rad10-Slx4 Exhibit a Unique Pattern of Viability During Mating-Type Switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179(4):1807-21
Alvaro D, et al.  (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet 3(12):e228
Ii M, et al.  (2007) Mus81 functions in the quality control of replication forks at the rDNA and is involved in the maintenance of rDNA repeat number in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 625(1-2):1-19
Kitagawa T, et al.  (2007) Genome-Wide Analysis of Cellular Response to Bacterial Genotoxin CdtB in Yeast. Infect Immun 75(3):1393-402
Klassen R, et al.  (2007) Homologous recombination and the yKu70/80 complex exert opposite roles in resistance against the killer toxin from Pichia acaciae. DNA Repair (Amst) 6(12):1864-75
Liao C, et al.  (2007) Genomic Screening in Vivo Reveals the Role Played by Vacuolar H+ ATPase and Cytosolic Acidification in Sensitivity to DNA-Damaging Agents Such as Cisplatin. Mol Pharmacol 71(2):416-25
Nag DK and Cavallo SJ  (2007) Effects of mutations in SGS1 and in genes functionally related to SGS1 on inverted repeat-stimulated spontaneous unequal sister-chromatid exchange in yeast. BMC Mol Biol 8:120
St Onge RP, et al.  (2007) Systematic pathway analysis using high-resolution fitness profiling of combinatorial gene deletions. Nat Genet 39(2):199-206
Ui A, et al.  (2007) Activation of a novel pathway involving Mms1 and Rad59 in sgs1 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 356(4):1031-7
Azam M, et al.  (2006) Evidence that the S.cerevisiae Sgs1 protein facilitates recombinational repair of telomeres during senescence. Nucleic Acids Res 34(2):506-16
Blake D, et al.  (2006) The F-Box Protein Dia2 Overcomes Replication Impedance to Promote Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174(4):1709-27
Chin JK, et al.  (2006) Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(5):618-28
Robert T, et al.  (2006) Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover. EMBO J 25(12):2837-46
Woolstencroft RN, et al.  (2006) Ccr4 contributes to tolerance of replication stress through control of CRT1 mRNA poly(A) tail length. J Cell Sci 119(Pt 24):5178-92
Zhang C, et al.  (2006) Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(3):336-46
Chang M, et al.  (2005) RMI1/NCE4, a suppressor of genome instability, encodes a member of the RecQ helicase/Topo III complex. EMBO J 24(11):2024-33
Deng C, et al.  (2005) Multiple endonucleases function to repair covalent topoisomerase I complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 170(2):591-600
Hwang JY, et al.  (2005) The Rad1-Rad10 complex promotes the production of gross chromosomal rearrangements from spontaneous DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169(4):1927-37
Ii M and Brill SJ  (2005) Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48(4):213-25
Lee W, et al.  (2005) Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet 1(2):e24
Peoples-Holst TL and Burgess SM  (2005) Multiple branches of the meiotic recombination pathway contribute independently to homolog pairing and stable juxtaposition during meiosis in budding yeast. Genes Dev 19(7):863-74
Abdullah MF, et al.  (2004) A role for the MutL homologue MLH2 in controlling heteroduplex formation and in regulating between two different crossover pathways in budding yeast. Cytogenet Genome Res 107(3-4):180-90
Argueso JL, et al.  (2004) Competing crossover pathways act during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168(4):1805-16
Giaever G, et al.  (2004) Chemogenomic profiling: identifying the functional interactions of small molecules in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(3):793-8
Schmidt KH and Kolodner RD  (2004) Requirement of Rrm3 helicase for repair of spontaneous DNA lesions in cells lacking Srs2 or Sgs1 helicase. Mol Cell Biol 24(8):3213-26
Results: 31 - 60 of 77 records
   1  2  3