RAD51/YER095W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for RAD51: MUT5, recombinase RAD51, YER095W

RAD51 - Mutants/Phenotypes (368)

Results: 211 - 240 of 368 records
   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10   >>>
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
DeMase D, et al.  (2005) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae PDS1 and RAD9 checkpoint genes control different DNA double-strand break repair pathways. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(1):59-69
Fasullo M, et al.  (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(11):1240-51
Guo Y, et al.  (2005) Expression of a human cytochrome p450 in yeast permits analysis of pathways for response to and repair of aflatoxin-induced DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol 25(14):5823-33
Huang ME and Kolodner RD  (2005) A biological network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae prevents the deleterious effects of endogenous oxidative DNA damage. Mol Cell 17(5):709-20
Ii M and Brill SJ  (2005) Roles of SGS1, MUS81, and RAD51 in the repair of lagging-strand replication defects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48(4):213-25
Lee W, et al.  (2005) Genome-wide requirements for resistance to functionally distinct DNA-damaging agents. PLoS Genet 1(2):e24
Paffett KS, et al.  (2005) Overexpression of Rad51 inhibits double-strand break-induced homologous recombination but does not affect gene conversion tract lengths. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(6):687-98
Pfander B, et al.  (2005) SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature 436(7049):428-33
Prado F and Aguilera A  (2005) Partial depletion of histone H4 increases homologous recombination-mediated genetic instability. Mol Cell Biol 25(4):1526-36
Putnam CD, et al.  (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to define the chromosomal instability phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 25(16):7226-38
Yamana Y, et al.  (2005) Regulation of homologous integration in yeast by the DNA repair proteins Ku70 and RecQ. Mol Genet Genomics 273(2):167-76
Zhang XP, et al.  (2005) Gly-103 in the N-terminal domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein is critical for DNA binding. J Biol Chem 280(28):26303-11
Bhattacharyya S and Lahue RS  (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Srs2 DNA helicase selectively blocks expansions of trinucleotide repeats. Mol Cell Biol 24(17):7324-30
Brozmanova J, et al.  (2004) How heterologously expressed Escherichia coli genes contribute to understanding DNA repair processes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 46(6):317-30
Conway AB, et al.  (2004) Crystal structure of a Rad51 filament. Nat Struct Mol Biol 11(8):791-6
Cortes-Ledesma F, et al.  (2004) A novel yeast mutation, rad52-L89F, causes a specific defect in Rad51-independent recombination that correlates with a reduced ability of Rad52-L89F to interact with Rad59. Genetics 168(1):553-7
Daigaku Y, et al.  (2004) Loss of heterozygosity and DNA damage repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res 556(1-2):183-91
Davis AP and Symington LS  (2004) RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24(6):2344-51
Dudasova Z, et al.  (2004) Disruption of the RAD51 gene sensitizes S. cerevisiae cells to the toxic and mutagenic effects of hydrogen peroxide. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 49(3):259-64
Keller-Seitz MU, et al.  (2004) Transcriptional response of yeast to aflatoxin B1: recombinational repair involving RAD51 and RAD1. Mol Biol Cell 15(9):4321-36
Liu L, et al.  (2004) Genetic re-engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD51 leads to a significant increase in the frequency of gene repair in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res 32(7):2093-101
Miyazaki T, et al.  (2004) In vivo assembly and disassembly of Rad51 and Rad52 complexes during double-strand break repair. EMBO J 23(4):939-49
Pennaneach V and Kolodner RD  (2004) Recombination and the Tel1 and Mec1 checkpoints differentially effect genome rearrangements driven by telomere dysfunction in yeast. Nat Genet 36(6):612-7
Saffran WA, et al.  (2004) DNA repair defects channel interstrand DNA cross-links into alternate recombinational and error-prone repair pathways. J Biol Chem 279(35):36462-9
Soustelle C, et al.  (2004) A new Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a mutant Smt3-deconjugating Ulp1 protein is affected in DNA replication and requires Srs2 and homologous recombination for its viability. Mol Cell Biol 24(12):5130-43
Spell RM and Jinks-Robertson S  (2004) Examination of the roles of Sgs1 and Srs2 helicases in the enforcement of recombination fidelity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 168(4):1855-65
Torres JZ, et al.  (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol Cell Biol 24(8):3198-212
Wang X and Haber JE  (2004) Role of Saccharomyces single-stranded DNA-binding protein RPA in the strand invasion step of double-strand break repair. PLoS Biol 2(1):E21
van Waardenburg RC, et al.  (2004) Homologous recombination is a highly conserved determinant of the synergistic cytotoxicity between cisplatin and DNA topoisomerase I poisons. Mol Cancer Ther 3(4):393-402
Chanet R and Heude M  (2003) Characterization of mutations that are synthetic lethal with pol3-13, a mutated allele of DNA polymerase delta in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 43(5):337-50
Results: 211 - 240 of 368 records
   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10   >>>