CHK1/YBR274W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for CHK1: YBR274W

CHK1 - Mutants/Phenotypes (65)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
McSherry TD, et al.  (2007) Non-catalytic function for ATR in the checkpoint response. Cell Cycle 6(16):2019-30
Morrison AJ, et al.  (2007) Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130(3):499-511
Schwartz DC, et al.  (2007) The Ulp2 SUMO protease is required for cell division following termination of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 27(19):6948-61
Sun M and Fasullo M  (2007) Activation of the budding yeast securin Pds1 but not Rad53 correlates with double-strand break-associated G2/M cell cycle arrest in a mec1 hypomorphic mutant. Cell Cycle 6(15):1896-902
Tsolou A and Lydall D  (2007) Mrc1 protects uncapped budding yeast telomeres from exonuclease EXO1. DNA Repair (Amst) 6(11):1607-1617
Barbour L, et al.  (2006) DNA damage checkpoints are involved in postreplication repair. Genetics 174(4):1789-800
Chin JK, et al.  (2006) Esc4/Rtt107 and the control of recombination during replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 5(5):618-28
Enserink JM, et al.  (2006) Checkpoint proteins control morphogenetic events during DNA replication stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 175(5):729-41
Gabrielse C, et al.  (2006) A Dbf4p BRCA1 C-terminal-like domain required for the response to replication fork arrest in budding yeast. Genetics 173(2):541-55
Koepp DM, et al.  (2006) The F-box protein Dia2 regulates DNA replication. Mol Biol Cell 17(4):1540-8
Schmidt KH and Kolodner RD  (2006) Suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements in yeast DNA helicase mutants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(48):18196-201
Woolstencroft RN, et al.  (2006) Ccr4 contributes to tolerance of replication stress through control of CRT1 mRNA poly(A) tail length. J Cell Sci 119(Pt 24):5178-92
Fasullo M, et al.  (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD53 (CHK2) but not CHK1 is required for double-strand break-initiated SCE and DNA damage-associated SCE after exposure to X rays and chemical agents. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(11):1240-51
Flott S and Rouse J  (2005) Slx4 becomes phosphorylated after DNA damage in a Mec1/Tel1-dependent manner and is required for repair of DNA alkylation damage. Biochem J 391(Pt 2):325-33
Grandin N, et al.  (2005) Activation of Mrc1, a mediator of the replication checkpoint, by telomere erosion. Biol Cell 97(10):799-814
Karumbati AS and Wilson TE  (2005) Abrogation of the Chk1-Pds1 checkpoint leads to tolerance of persistent single-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169(4):1833-44
Michelson RJ, et al.  (2005) A telomeric repeat sequence adjacent to a DNA double-stranded break produces an anticheckpoint. Genes Dev 19(21):2546-59
Putnam CD, et al.  (2005) Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system to define the chromosomal instability phenotype. Mol Cell Biol 25(16):7226-38
Banerjee S and Myung K  (2004) Increased genome instability and telomere length in the elg1-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant are regulated by S-phase checkpoints. Eukaryot Cell 3(6):1557-66
Baroni E, et al.  (2004) The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation. Mol Cell Biol 24(10):4151-65
Blankley RT and Lydall D  (2004) A domain of Rad9 specifically required for activation of Chk1 in budding yeast. J Cell Sci 117(Pt 4):601-8
Clerici M, et al.  (2004) A Tel1/MRX-dependent checkpoint inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition after UV irradiation in the absence of Mec1. Mol Cell Biol 24(23):10126-44
Haghnazari E and Heyer WD  (2004) The DNA damage checkpoint pathways exert multiple controls on the efficiency and outcome of the repair of a double-stranded DNA gap. Nucleic Acids Res 32(14):4257-68
Ira G, et al.  (2004) DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431(7011):1011-7
Jia X, et al.  (2004) Mec1 and Rad53 inhibit formation of single-stranded DNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants. Genetics 166(2):753-64
Lahiri M, et al.  (2004) Expanded CAG repeats activate the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell 15(2):287-93
Schollaert KL, et al.  (2004) A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae Chk1p in the response to replication blocks. Mol Biol Cell 15(9):4051-63
Searle JS, et al.  (2004) The DNA damage checkpoint and PKA pathways converge on APC substrates and Cdc20 to regulate mitotic progression. Nat Cell Biol 6(2):138-45
Torres JZ, et al.  (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rrm3p DNA helicase promotes genome integrity by preventing replication fork stalling: viability of rrm3 cells requires the intra-S-phase checkpoint and fork restart activities. Mol Cell Biol 24(8):3198-212
Kim EM, et al.  (2002) Phosphorylation of Rph1, a damage-responsive repressor of PHR1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is dependent upon Rad53 kinase. Nucleic Acids Res 30(3):643-8