FHL1/YPR104C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for FHL1: SPP42, YPR104C

FHL1 - Genomic expression study (22)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Chin SL, et al.  (2012) Dynamics of oscillatory phenotypes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal a network of genome-wide transcriptional oscillators. FEBS J 279(6):1119-30
Geijer C, et al.  (2012) Time course gene expression profiling of yeast spore germination reveals a network of transcription factors orchestrating the global response. BMC Genomics 13(1):554
Miller C, et al.  (2012) Mediator phosphorylation prevents stress response transcription during non-stress conditions. J Biol Chem 287(53):44017-26
Sharon E, et al.  (2012) Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters.LID - 10.1038/nbt.2205 [doi] Nat Biotechnol ()
Boender LG, et al.  (2011) Extreme calorie restriction and energy source starvation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae represent distinct physiological states. Biochim Biophys Acta 1813(12):2133-44
Ratnakumar S, et al.  (2011) Phenomic and transcriptomic analyses reveal that autophagy plays a major role in desiccation tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biosyst 7(1):139-49
Ma M and Liu ZL  (2010) Comparative transcriptome profiling analyses during the lag phase uncover YAP1, PDR1, PDR3, RPN4, and HSF1 as key regulatory genes in genomic adaptation to the lignocellulose derived inhibitor HMF for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 11():660
Rodriguez-Colman MJ, et al.  (2010) The forkhead transcription factor hcm1 promotes mitochondrial biogenesis and stress resistance in yeast. J Biol Chem 285(47):37092-101
Tsankov AM, et al.  (2010) The role of nucleosome positioning in the evolution of gene regulation. PLoS Biol 8(7):e1000414
Chen AK, et al.  (2009) Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to stress-free acidification. J Microbiol 47(1):1-8
Ye Y, et al.  (2009) Gaining insight into the response logic of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to heat shock by combining expression profiles with metabolic pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 385(3):357-62
Zhu C, et al.  (2009) High-resolution DNA-binding specificity analysis of yeast transcription factors. Genome Res 19(4):556-66
Choi JK and Kim YJ  (2008) Epigenetic regulation and the variability of gene expression. Nat Genet 40(2):141-7
Fazio A, et al.  (2008) Transcription factor control of growth rate dependent genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a three factor design. BMC Genomics 9:341
Lai LC, et al.  (2008) Comparison of the transcriptomic "stress response" evoked by antimycin A and oxygen deprivation in saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 9:627
van den Brink J, et al.  (2008) New insights into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation switch: dynamic transcriptional response to anaerobicity and glucose-excess. BMC Genomics 9:100
Kresnowati MT, et al.  (2006) When transcriptome meets metabolome: fast cellular responses of yeast to sudden relief of glucose limitation. Mol Syst Biol 2():49
Lai LC, et al.  (2006) Metabolic-state-dependent remodeling of the transcriptome in response to anoxia and subsequent reoxygenation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5(9):1468-89
Tanaka F, et al.  (2006) Functional genomic analysis of commercial baker's yeast during initial stages of model dough-fermentation. Food Microbiol 23(8):717-28
Rudra D, et al.  (2005) Central role of Ifh1p-Fhl1p interaction in the synthesis of yeast ribosomal proteins. EMBO J 24(3):533-42
Haugen AC, et al.  (2004) Integrating phenotypic and expression profiles to map arsenic-response networks. Genome Biol 5(12):R95
Jorgensen P, et al.  (2004) A dynamic transcriptional network communicates growth potential to ribosome synthesis and critical cell size. Genes Dev 18(20):2491-505