DAN1/YJR150C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for DAN1: CCW13, YJR150C

DAN1 - Genomic expression study (22)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Vizoso-Vazquez A, et al.  (2012) Ixr1p and the control of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae hypoxic response. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 94(1):173-84
Carreto L, et al.  (2011) Expression variability of co-regulated genes differentiates Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. BMC Genomics 12(1):201
Hickman MJ, et al.  (2011) The Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase mediates a hypoxic response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 188(2):325-38
Kuo D, et al.  (2010) Evolutionary divergence in the fungal response to fluconazole revealed by soft clustering. Genome Biol 11(7):R77
Li BZ, et al.  (2010) Transcriptome analysis of differential responses of diploid and haploid yeast to ethanol stress. J Biotechnol 148(4):194-203
Morillo-Huesca M, et al.  (2010) The SWR1 Histone Replacement Complex Causes Genetic Instability and Genome-Wide Transcription Misregulation in the Absence of H2A.Z.LID - e12143 [pii] PLoS One 5(8)
Skibbens RV, et al.  (2010) Cohesins coordinate gene transcriptions of related function within Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 9(8):1601-6
Azzouz N, et al.  (2009) Specific roles for the Ccr4-Not complex subunits in expression of the genome. RNA 15(3):377-83
Rintala E, et al.  (2009) Low oxygen levels as a trigger for enhancement of respiratory metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 10():461
Rossouw D, et al.  (2009) Comparative transcriptomic approach to investigate differences in wine yeast physiology and metabolism during fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 75(20):6600-12
Masson P, et al.  (2008) The dual control of TFIIB recruitment by NC2 is gene specific. Nucleic Acids Res 36(2):539-49
Rojas M, et al.  (2008) Genomewide expression profiling of cryptolepine-induced toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52(11):3844-50
Smukalla S, et al.  (2008) FLO1 Is a Variable Green Beard Gene that Drives Biofilm-like Cooperation in Budding Yeast. Cell 135(4):726-37
van den Brink J, et al.  (2008) New insights into the Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation switch: dynamic transcriptional response to anaerobicity and glucose-excess. BMC Genomics 9:100
Abe F  (2007) Induction of DAN/TIR yeast cell wall mannoprotein genes in response to high hydrostatic pressure and low temperature. FEBS Lett 581(25):4993-8
Reynolds TB  (2006) The Opi1p transcription factor affects expression of FLO11, mat formation, and invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Eukaryot Cell 5(8):1266-75
Lai LC, et al.  (2005) Dynamical remodeling of the transcriptome during short-term anaerobiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: differential response and role of Msn2 and/or Msn4 and other factors in galactose and glucose media. Mol Cell Biol 25(10):4075-91
Parveen M, et al.  (2004) Response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to a monoterpene: evaluation of antifungal potential by DNA microarray analysis. J Antimicrob Chemother 54(1):46-55
Agarwal AK, et al.  (2003) Genome-wide expression profiling of the response to polyene, pyrimidine, azole, and echinocandin antifungal agents in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 278(37):34998-5015
Santiago TC and Mamoun CB  (2003) Genome expression analysis in yeast reveals novel transcriptional regulation by inositol and choline and new regulatory functions for Opi1p, Ino2p, and Ino4p. J Biol Chem 278(40):38723-30
Piper MD, et al.  (2002) Reproducibility of oligonucleotide microarray transcriptome analyses. An interlaboratory comparison using chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 277(40):37001-8
Ter Linde JJ, et al.  (1999) Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of aerobic and anaerobic chemostat cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol 181(24):7409-13