Other names published for MAD3: YJL013C
MAD3 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Cell Cycle Phase Involved
- Cellular Location
- Function/Process
- Genetic Interactions
- Mutants/Phenotypes
- Regulatory Role
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Additional Information
MAD3 - Genetic Interactions (30)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Lau DT and Murray AW (2012) Mad2 and Mad3 cooperate to arrest budding yeast in mitosis. Curr Biol 22(3):180-90 | |
| Matson DR, et al. (2012) A conserved role for COMA/CENP-H/I/N kinetochore proteins in the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev 26(6):542-7 | |
| Barnhart EL, et al. (2011) Reduced Mad2 expression keeps relaxed kinetochores from arresting budding yeast in mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 22(14):2448-57 | |
| Dotiwala F, et al. (2010) Mad2 Prolongs DNA Damage Checkpoint Arrest Caused by a Double-Strand Break via a Centromere-Dependent Mechanism. Curr Biol 20(4):328-332 | |
| Mehta M, et al. (2010) Individual Lysine Acetylations on the N Terminus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae H2A.Z Are Highly but Not Differentially Regulated. J Biol Chem 285(51):39855-65 | |
| Newnham L, et al. (2010) The synaptonemal complex protein, Zip1, promotes the segregation of nonexchange chromosomes at meiosis I. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(2):781-5 | |
| Rossio V, et al. (2010) The RSC chromatin-remodeling complex influences mitotic exit and adaptation to the spindle assembly checkpoint by controlling the Cdc14 phosphatase. J Cell Biol 191(5):981-97 | |
| Zheng J, et al. (2010) Epistatic relationships reveal the functional organization of yeast transcription factors. Mol Syst Biol 6():420 | |
| Chiroli E, et al. (2009) Cdc14 inhibition by the spindle assembly checkpoint prevents unscheduled centrosome separation in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 20(10):2626-37 | |
| Doncic A, et al. (2009) Reverse engineering of the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS One 4(8):e6495 | |
| Ng TM, et al. (2009) Pericentromeric sister chromatid cohesion promotes kinetochore biorientation. Mol Biol Cell 20(17):3818-27 | |
| Amaro IA, et al. (2008) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of p24 Is Essential for Maintaining the Association of p150Glued With the Dynactin Complex. Genetics 178(2):703-9 | |
| Kim EM and Burke DJ (2008) DNA damage activates the SAC in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner, independently of the kinetochore. PLoS Genet 4(2):e1000015 | |
| Ohkuni K, et al. (2008) Ybp2 Associates with the Central Kinetochore of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Mediates Proper Mitotic Progression. PLoS ONE 3(2):e1617 | |
| King EM, et al. (2007) Ipl1p-dependent phosphorylation of Mad3p is required for the spindle checkpoint response to lack of tension at kinetochores. Genes Dev 21(10):1163-8 | |
| King EM, et al. (2007) Mad3 KEN boxes mediate both Cdc20 and Mad3 turnover, and are critical for the spindle checkpoint. PLoS One 2(4):e342 | |
| Yong-Gonzalez V, et al. (2007) Condensin function at centromere chromatin facilitates proper kinetochore tension and ensures correct mitotic segregation of sister chromatids. Genes Cells 12(9):1075-90 | |
| Pathak R, et al. (2005) A role for KEM1 at the START of the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 48(5):300-9 | |
| Bogomolnaya LM, et al. (2004) Hym1p affects cell cycle progression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 46(4):183-92 | |
| Lee MS and Spencer FA (2004) Bipolar orientation of chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is monitored by Mad1 and Mad2, but not by Mad3. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(29):10655-60 | |
| Myung K, et al. (2004) Mitotic checkpoint function in the formation of gross chromosomal rearrangements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101(45):15980-5 | |
| Parsons AB, et al. (2004) Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat Biotechnol 22(1):62-9 | |
| Tong AH, et al. (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303(5659):808-13 | |
| Abruzzi KC, et al. (2002) An alpha-tubulin mutant demonstrates distinguishable functions among the spindle assembly checkpoint genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 161(3):983-94 | |
| Myung K, et al. (2001) Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104(3):397-408 | |
| Tong AH, et al. (2001) Systematic genetic analysis with ordered arrays of yeast deletion mutants. Science 294(5550):2364-8 | |
| Hardwick KG, et al. (1999) Lesions in many different spindle components activate the spindle checkpoint in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 152(2):509-18 | |
| Li R (1999) Bifurcation of the mitotic checkpoint pathway in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96(9):4989-94 | |
| Noguchi E, et al. (1999) Disruption of the YRB2 gene retards nuclear protein export, causing a profound mitotic delay, and can be rescued by overexpression of XPO1/CRM1. J Biochem 125(3):574-85 | |
| Farr KA and Hoyt MA (1998) Bub1p kinase activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 18(5):2738-47 |





