CHK1/YBR274W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for CHK1: YBR274W

CHK1 - Genetic Interactions (46)

Results: 1 - 30 of 46 records
   1  2 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Collura A, et al.  (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9-1-1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(3):294-303
Eapen VV, et al.  (2012) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol Cell Biol 32(22):4727-40
Chang HY, et al.  (2011) Genome-wide analysis to identify pathways affecting telomere-initiated senescence in budding yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 1(3):197-208
Chen X, et al.  (2011) Cell cycle regulation of DNA double-strand break end resection by Cdk1-dependent Dna2 phosphorylation.LID - 10.1038/nsmb.2105 [doi] Nat Struct Mol Biol ()
Searle JS, et al.  (2011) Proteins in the Nutrient-Sensing and DNA Damage Checkpoint Pathways Cooperate to Restrain Mitotic Progression following DNA Damage. PLoS Genet 7(7):e1002176
Kaochar S, et al.  (2010) Checkpoint genes and Exo1 regulate nearby inverted repeat fusions that form dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(50):21605-10
Kile AC and Koepp DM  (2010) Activation of the s-phase checkpoint inhibits degradation of the f-box protein dia2. Mol Cell Biol 30(1):160-71
Theis JF, et al.  (2010) The DNA Damage Response Pathway Contributes to the Stability of Chromosome III Derivatives Lacking Efficient Replicators. PLoS Genet 6(12):e1001227
Wood MD and Sanchez Y  (2010) Deregulated Ras signaling compromises DNA damage checkpoint recovery in S. cerevisiae. Cell Cycle 9(16):3353-63
Chen Y, et al.  (2009) ATRMec1 phosphorylation-independent activation of Chk1 in vivo. J Biol Chem 284(1):182-90
Heidinger-Pauli JM, et al.  (2009) Distinct targets of the Eco1 acetyltransferase modulate cohesion in S phase and in response to DNA damage. Mol Cell 34(3):311-21
Liang F, et al.  (2009) The molecular function of the yeast polo-like kinase Cdc5 in Cdc14 release during early anaphase. Mol Biol Cell 20(16):3671-9
Lin YH, et al.  (2009) Recruitment of rad51 and rad52 to short telomeres triggers a mec1-mediated hypersensitivity to double-stranded DNA breaks in senescent budding yeast. PLoS One 4(12):e8224
Addinall SG, et al.  (2008) A Genomewide Suppressor and Enhancer Analysis of cdc13-1 Reveals Varied Cellular Processes Influencing Telomere Capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180(4):2251-66
Caldwell JM, et al.  (2008) Orchestration of the S-phase and DNA damage checkpoint pathways by replication forks from early origins. J Cell Biol 180(6):1073-86
Fasullo M and Sun M  (2008) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint genes RAD9, CHK1 and PDS1 are required for elevated homologous recombination in a mec1 (ATR) hypomorphic mutant. Cell Cycle 7(15):2418-26
Grandin N and Charbonneau M  (2008) Budding yeast 14-3-3 proteins contribute to the robustness of the DNA damage and spindle checkpoints. Cell Cycle 7(17):2749-61
Hwang JY, et al.  (2008) Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA Repair (Amst) 7(9):1426-36
Kim EM and Burke DJ  (2008) DNA damage activates the SAC in an ATM/ATR-dependent manner, independently of the kinetochore. PLoS Genet 4(2):e1000015
Puddu F, et al.  (2008) Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 28(15):4782-93
Segurado M and Diffley JF  (2008) Separate roles for the DNA damage checkpoint protein kinases in stabilizing DNA replication forks. Genes Dev 22(13):1816-27
Curcio MJ, et al.  (2007) S-phase checkpoint pathways stimulate the mobility of the retrovirus-like transposon Ty1. Mol Cell Biol 27(24):8874-85
Dotiwala F, et al.  (2007) The yeast DNA damage checkpoint proteins control a cytoplasmic response to DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(27):11358-63
Grandin N and Charbonneau M  (2007) Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA. Nucleic Acids Res 35(3):822-38
Liang F and Wang Y  (2007) DNA damage checkpoints inhibit mitotic exit by two different mechanisms. Mol Cell Biol 27(14):5067-78
Schwartz DC, et al.  (2007) The Ulp2 SUMO protease is required for cell division following termination of the DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 27(19):6948-61
Sun M and Fasullo M  (2007) Activation of the budding yeast securin Pds1 but not Rad53 correlates with double-strand break-associated G2/M cell cycle arrest in a mec1 hypomorphic mutant. Cell Cycle 6(15):1896-902
Tsolou A and Lydall D  (2007) Mrc1 protects uncapped budding yeast telomeres from exonuclease EXO1. DNA Repair (Amst) 6(11):1607-1617
Yong-Gonzalez V, et al.  (2007) Condensin function at centromere chromatin facilitates proper kinetochore tension and ensures correct mitotic segregation of sister chromatids. Genes Cells 12(9):1075-90
Gabrielse C, et al.  (2006) A Dbf4p BRCA1 C-terminal-like domain required for the response to replication fork arrest in budding yeast. Genetics 173(2):541-55
Results: 1 - 30 of 46 records
   1  2