DDC1/YPL194W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for DDC1: YPL194W

DDC1 - Genetic Interactions (38)

Results: 1 - 30 of 38 records
   1  2 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Collura A, et al.  (2012) Abasic sites linked to dUTP incorporation in DNA are a major cause of spontaneous mutations in absence of base excision repair and Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1 (9-1-1) DNA damage checkpoint clamp in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 11(3):294-303
de Kok S, et al.  (2012) Laboratory evolution of new lactate transporter genes in a jen1Delta mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their identification as ADY2 alleles by whole-genome resequencing and transcriptome analysis.LID - 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2012.00787.x [doi] FEMS Yeast Res ()
Addinall SG, et al.  (2011) Quantitative Fitness Analysis Shows That NMD Proteins and Many Other Protein Complexes Suppress or Enhance Distinct Telomere Cap Defects. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1001362
Navadgi-Patil VM, et al.  (2011) The unstructured C-terminal tail of yeast Dpb11 (human TopBP1) protein is dispensable for DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint but required for the G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem 286(47):40999-1007
Puddu F, et al.  (2011) Sensing of Replication Stress and Mec1 Activation Act through Two Independent Pathways Involving the 9-1-1 Complex and DNA Polymerase epsilon. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1002022
Reha-Krantz LJ, et al.  (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24
Reid RJ, et al.  (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3):477-86
Sukhanova MV, et al.  (2011) Ddc1 checkpoint protein and DNA polymerase ? interact with nick-containing DNA repair intermediate in cell free extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(8):815-25
Eichinger CS and Jentsch S  (2010) Synaptonemal complex formation and meiotic checkpoint signaling are linked to the lateral element protein Red1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107(25):11370-5
Murakami-Sekimata A, et al.  (2010) The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst) 9(7):824-34
Gomez-Gonzalez B, et al.  (2009) The S-phase checkpoint is required to respond to R-loops accumulated in THO mutants. Mol Cell Biol 29(19):5203-13
Navadgi-Patil VM and Burgers PM  (2009) The Unstructured C-Terminal Tail of the 9-1-1 Clamp Subunit Ddc1 Activates Mec1/ATR via Two Distinct Mechanisms. Mol Cell 36(5):743-753
Pages V, et al.  (2009) Role of DNA damage-induced replication checkpoint in promoting lesion bypass by translesion synthesis in yeast. Genes Dev 23(12):1438-49
Addinall SG, et al.  (2008) A Genomewide Suppressor and Enhancer Analysis of cdc13-1 Reveals Varied Cellular Processes Influencing Telomere Capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180(4):2251-66
Baldo V, et al.  (2008) Dominant TEL1-hy mutations compensate for Mec1 lack of functions in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 28(1):358-75
Bonilla CY, et al.  (2008) Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. Mol Cell 30(3):267-76
Hwang JY, et al.  (2008) Smc5-Smc6 complex suppresses gross chromosomal rearrangements mediated by break-induced replications. DNA Repair (Amst) 7(9):1426-36
Mordes DA, et al.  (2008) Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(48):18730-4
Puddu F, et al.  (2008) Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol 28(15):4782-93
Alvaro D, et al.  (2007) Genome-wide analysis of Rad52 foci reveals diverse mechanisms impacting recombination. PLoS Genet 3(12):e228
Grandin N and Charbonneau M  (2007) Control of the yeast telomeric senescence survival pathways of recombination by the Mec1 and Mec3 DNA damage sensors and RPA. Nucleic Acids Res 35(3):822-38
Hanna M, et al.  (2007) Pol32 is required for Pol zeta-dependent translesion synthesis and prevents double-strand breaks at the replication fork. Mutat Res 625(1-2):164-76
Mitra N and Roeder GS  (2007) A novel nonnull ZIP1 allele triggers meiotic arrest with synapsed chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 176(2):773-87
Morrison AJ, et al.  (2007) Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130(3):499-511
Barbour L, et al.  (2006) DNA damage checkpoints are involved in postreplication repair. Genetics 174(4):1789-800
Ogiwara H, et al.  (2006) Dpb11, the budding yeast homolog of TopBP1, functions with the checkpoint clamp in recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res 34(11):3389-98
Pan X, et al.  (2006) A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124(5):1069-81
Archambault V, et al.  (2005) Disruption of mechanisms that prevent rereplication triggers a DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 25(15):6707-21
Majka J and Burgers PM  (2005) Function of Rad17/Mec3/Ddc1 and its partial complexes in the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst) 4(10):1189-94
Sabbioneda S, et al.  (2005) The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280(46):38657-65
Results: 1 - 30 of 38 records
   1  2