Other names published for STE4: HMD2, YOR212W
STE4 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Cell Cycle Phase Involved
- Cellular Location
- Function/Process
- Genetic Interactions
- Mutants/Phenotypes
- Regulation of
- Regulatory Role
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
STE4 - Genetic Interactions (31)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Fernandez-Pinar P, et al. (2012) The Salmonella Typhimurium effector SteC inhibits Cdc42-mediated signaling through binding to the exchange factor Cdc24 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 23(22):4430-43 | |
| Cappell SD and Dohlman HG (2011) Selective Regulation of MAP Kinase Signaling by an Endomembrane Phosphatidylinositol 4-Kinase. J Biol Chem 286(17):14852-60 | |
| Cappell SD, et al. (2010) Systematic analysis of essential genes reveals important regulators of G protein signaling. Mol Cell 38(5):746-57 | |
| Yamamoto K, et al. (2010) Dynamic control of yeast MAP kinase network by induced association and dissociation between the Ste50 scaffold and the Opy2 membrane anchor. Mol Cell 40(1):87-98 | |
| Liu C, et al. (2009) A genome-wide synthetic dosage lethality screen reveals multiple pathways that require the functioning of ubiquitin-binding proteins Rad23 and Dsk2. BMC Biol 7(1):75 | |
| Yang HY, et al. (2009) Glycosylation defects activate filamentous growth Kss1 MAPK and inhibit osmoregulatory Hog1 MAPK. EMBO J 28(10):1380-91 | |
| Niu W, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Revealed by a Systematic and Quantitative Overexpression Screen in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 4(7):e1000120 | |
| Strickfaden SC and Pryciak PM (2008) Distinct Roles for Two G{alpha} G Interfaces in Cell Polarity Control by a Yeast Heterotrimeric G Protein. Mol Biol Cell 19(1):181-97 | |
| Frydlova I, et al. (2007) Special type of pheromone-induced invasive growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr Genet 52(2):87-95 | |
| Takahashi S and Pryciak PM (2007) Identification of Novel Membrane-binding Domains in Multiple Yeast Cdc42 Effectors. Mol Biol Cell 18(12):4945-56 | |
| Bao MZ, et al. (2004) Pheromone-dependent destruction of the Tec1 transcription factor is required for MAP kinase signaling specificity in yeast. Cell 119(7):991-1000 | |
| Bar EE, et al. (2003) Gbetagamma recruits Rho1 to the site of polarized growth during mating in budding yeast. J Biol Chem 278(24):21798-804 | |
| Ongay-Larios L, et al. (2000) The Leu-132 of the Ste4(Gbeta) subunit is essential for proper coupling of the G protein with the Ste2 alpha factor receptor during the mating pheromone response in yeast. FEBS Lett 467(1):22-6 | |
| Sette C, et al. (2000) Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):4033-49 | |
| Kim J, et al. (1999) Receptor inhibition of pheromone signaling is mediated by the Ste4p Gbeta subunit. Mol Cell Biol 19(1):441-9 | |
| Caponigro G, et al. (1998) Transdominant genetic analysis of a growth control pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95(13):7508-13 | |
| Dowell SJ, et al. (1998) Mapping of a yeast G protein betagamma signaling interaction. Genetics 150(4):1407-17 | |
| Kim J and Hirsch JP (1998) A nucleolar protein that affects mating efficiency in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by altering the morphological response to pheromone. Genetics 149(2):795-805 | |
| Li E, et al. (1998) Substitutions in the pheromone-responsive Gbeta protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae confer a defect in recovery from pheromone treatment. Genetics 148(3):947-61 | |
| Nern A and Arkowitz RA (1998) A GTP-exchange factor required for cell orientation. Nature 391(6663):195-8 | |
| Oehlen LJ and Cross FR (1998) Potential regulation of Ste20 function by the Cln1-Cdc28 and Cln2-Cdc28 cyclin-dependent protein kinases. J Biol Chem 273(39):25089-97 | |
| Pryciak PM and Huntress FA (1998) Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev 12(17):2684-97 | |
| Inouye C, et al. (1997) Ste5 RING-H2 domain: role in Ste4-promoted oligomerization for yeast pheromone signaling. Science 278(5335):103-6 | |
| Akada R, et al. (1996) Genetic relationships between the G protein beta gamma complex, Ste5p, Ste20p and Cdc42p: investigation of effector roles in the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genetics 143(1):103-17 | |
| Pryciak PM and Hartwell LH (1996) AKR1 encodes a candidate effector of the G beta gamma complex in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway and contributes to control of both cell shape and signal transduction. Mol Cell Biol 16(6):2614-26 | |
| Dorer R, et al. (1995) Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells execute a default pathway to select a mate in the absence of pheromone gradients. J Cell Biol 131(4):845-61 | |
| Rad MR, et al. (1992) STE50, a novel gene required for activation of conjugation at an early step in mating in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Gen Genet 236(1):145-54 | |
| Stevenson BJ, et al. (1992) Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. Genes Dev 6(7):1293-304 | |
| Whiteway M, et al. (1992) Mutagenesis of Ste18, a putative G gamma subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pheromone response pathway. Biochem Cell Biol 70(10-11):1230-7 | |
| Elion EA, et al. (1991) FUS3 represses CLN1 and CLN2 and in concert with KSS1 promotes signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88(21):9392-6 |



