Other names published for STE5: HMD3, NUL3, YDR103W
STE5 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Cell Cycle Phase Involved
- Cellular Location
- Function/Process
- Genetic Interactions
- Mutants/Phenotypes
- Regulation of
- Regulatory Role
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Proteome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
STE5 - Genetic Interactions (25)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Fernandez-Pinar P, et al. (2012) The Salmonella Typhimurium effector SteC inhibits Cdc42-mediated signaling through binding to the exchange factor Cdc24 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 23(22):4430-43 | |
| Kim J and Rose MD (2012) A mechanism for the coordination of proliferation and differentiation by spatial regulation of Fus2p in budding yeast. Genes Dev 26(10):1110-21 | |
| Zalatan JG, et al. (2012) Conformational control of the Ste5 scaffold protein insulates against MAP kinase misactivation. Science 337(6099):1218-22 | |
| Doncic A, et al. (2011) Distinct interactions select and maintain a specific cell fate. Mol Cell 43(4):528-39 | |
| Wang X, et al. (2011) Ste11p MEKK signals through HOG, mating, calcineurin and PKC pathways to regulate the FKS2 gene. BMC Mol Biol 12(1):51 | |
| Yamamoto K, et al. (2010) Dynamic control of yeast MAP kinase network by induced association and dissociation between the Ste50 scaffold and the Opy2 membrane anchor. Mol Cell 40(1):87-98 | |
| Mazor Y and Kupiec M (2009) Developmentally regulated MAPK pathways modulate heterochromatin in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 37(14):4839-49 | |
| Yang HY, et al. (2009) Glycosylation defects activate filamentous growth Kss1 MAPK and inhibit osmoregulatory Hog1 MAPK. EMBO J 28(10):1380-91 | |
| Jin H, et al. (2008) Ergosterol promotes pheromone signaling and plasma membrane fusion in mating yeast. J Cell Biol 180(4):813-26 | |
| Niu W, et al. (2008) Mechanisms of Cell Cycle Control Revealed by a Systematic and Quantitative Overexpression Screen in S. cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 4(7):e1000120 | |
| Strickfaden SC and Pryciak PM (2008) Distinct Roles for Two G{alpha} G Interfaces in Cell Polarity Control by a Yeast Heterotrimeric G Protein. Mol Biol Cell 19(1):181-97 | |
| Yu L, et al. (2008) Counteractive Control of Polarized Morphogenesis during Mating by Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Fus3 and G1 Cyclin-dependent Kinase. Mol Biol Cell 19(4):1739-52 | |
| Takahashi S and Pryciak PM (2007) Identification of Novel Membrane-binding Domains in Multiple Yeast Cdc42 Effectors. Mol Biol Cell 18(12):4945-56 | |
| Lamson RE, et al. (2006) Dual role for membrane localization in yeast MAP kinase cascade activation and its contribution to signaling fidelity. Curr Biol 16(6):618-23 | |
| Schwartz MA and Madhani HD (2006) Control of MAPK signaling specificity by a conserved residue in the MEK-binding domain of the yeast scaffold protein Ste5. Curr Genet 49(6):351-63 | |
| Wang Y, et al. (2005) Cdc24 regulates nuclear shuttling and recruitment of the Ste5 scaffold to a heterotrimeric G protein in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 280(13):13084-96 | |
| Kunzler M, et al. (2001) Mutations in the YRB1 gene encoding yeast ran-binding-protein-1 that impair nucleocytoplasmic transport and suppress yeast mating defects. Genetics 157(3):1089-105 | |
| Crosby JA, et al. (2000) Constitutive activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae transcriptional regulator Ste12p by mutations at the amino-terminus. Yeast 16(15):1365-75 | |
| Sette C, et al. (2000) Mutational analysis suggests that activation of the yeast pheromone response mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway involves conformational changes in the Ste5 scaffold protein. Mol Biol Cell 11(11):4033-49 | |
| Dowell SJ, et al. (1998) Mapping of a yeast G protein betagamma signaling interaction. Genetics 150(4):1407-17 | |
| O'Rourke SM and Herskowitz I (1998) The Hog1 MAPK prevents cross talk between the HOG and pheromone response MAPK pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev 12(18):2874-86 | |
| Pryciak PM and Huntress FA (1998) Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gbetagamma complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev 12(17):2684-97 | |
| Akada R, et al. (1996) Genetic relationships between the G protein beta gamma complex, Ste5p, Ste20p and Cdc42p: investigation of effector roles in the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genetics 143(1):103-17 | |
| Stevenson BJ, et al. (1992) Constitutive mutants of the protein kinase STE11 activate the yeast pheromone response pathway in the absence of the G protein. Genes Dev 6(7):1293-304 | |
| Shuster JR (1982) Mating-defective ste mutations are suppressed by cell division cycle start mutations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 2(9):1052-63 |




