Other names published for SUI1: MOF2, RFR1, YNL244C
SUI1 LITERATURE TOPICS
- Curated Literature
- Additional Literature
- All Curated References
- Primary Literature
- Reviews
- Genetics/Cell Biology
- Nucleic Acid Information
- Gene Product Information
- Related Genes/Proteins
- Research Aids
- Genome-wide Analysis
- Other Topics
- Additional Information
SUI1 - Additional Literature (45)
| Reference | Other Genes Addressed |
|---|---|
| Herrmannova A, et al. (2012) Structural analysis of an eIF3 subcomplex reveals conserved interactions required for a stable and proper translation pre-initiation complex assembly. Nucleic Acids Res 40(5):2294-311 | |
| Strunk BS, et al. (2012) A translation-like cycle is a quality control checkpoint for maturing 40S ribosome subunits. Cell 150(1):111-21 | |
| Biver S, et al. (2011) Multicopy suppression screen in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain lacking the Rab GTPase-activating protein Msb3p. Biotechnol Lett 33(1):123-9 | |
| Eyler DE and Green R (2011) Distinct response of yeast ribosomes to a miscoding event during translation. RNA 17(5):925-32 | |
| Farley AR, et al. (2011) Assessing the Components of the eIF3 Complex and their Phosphorylation Status. J Proteome Res 10(4):1481-94 | |
| Strunk BS, et al. (2011) Ribosome assembly factors prevent premature translation initiation by 40S assembly intermediates. Science 333(6048):1449-53 | |
| Takacs JE, et al. (2011) Identification of compounds that decrease the fidelity of start codon recognition by the eukaryotic translational machinery. RNA 17(3):439-52 | |
| Li M, et al. (2010) Identifying the overlapping complexes in protein interaction networks. Int J Data Min Bioinform 4(1):91-108 | |
| Mitchell SF, et al. (2010) The 5'-7-Methylguanosine Cap on Eukaryotic mRNAs Serves Both to Stimulate Canonical Translation Initiation and to Block an Alternative Pathway. Mol Cell 39(6):950-62 | |
| Saini AK, et al. (2010) Regulatory elements in eIF1A control the fidelity of start codon selection by modulating tRNA(i)(Met) binding to the ribosome. Genes Dev 24(1):97-110 | |
| You T, et al. (2010) A quantitative model for mRNA translation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 27(10):785-800 | |
| Kolitz SE, et al. (2009) Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of the role of start codon/anticodon base pairing during eukaryotic translation initiation. RNA 15(1):138-52 | |
| Saini P, et al. (2009) Hypusine-containing protein eIF5A promotes translation elongation. Nature 459(7243):118-21 | |
| Alone PV, et al. (2008) Translation initiation factor 2gamma mutant alters start codon selection independent of Met-tRNA binding. Mol Cell Biol 28(22):6877-88 | |
| Breslow DK, et al. (2008) A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome. Nat Methods 5(8):711-8 | |
| Acker MG, et al. (2007) Reconstitution of yeast translation initiation. Methods Enzymol 430:111-45 | |
| Gilbert RJ, et al. (2007) Reconfiguration of yeast 40S ribosomal subunit domains by the translation initiation multifactor complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(14):5788-93 | |
| Oeffinger M, et al. (2007) Comprehensive analysis of diverse ribonucleoprotein complexes. Nat Methods 4(11):951-6 | |
| Singh CR, et al. (2007) Change in nutritional status modulates the abundance of critical pre-initiation intermediate complexes during translation initiation in vivo. J Mol Biol 370(2):315-30 | |
| Valasek L, et al. (2007) In vivo stabilization of preinitiation complexes by formaldehyde cross-linking. Methods Enzymol 429:163-83 | |
| Acker MG, et al. (2006) Interaction between eukaryotic initiation factors 1A and 5B is required for efficient ribosomal subunit joining. J Biol Chem 281(13):8469-75 | |
| Jivotovskaya AV, et al. (2006) Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) and eIF2 can promote mRNA binding to 40S subunits independently of eIF4G in yeast. Mol Cell Biol 26(4):1355-72 | |
| Singh CR, et al. (2006) An eIF5/eIF2 complex antagonizes guanine nucleotide exchange by eIF2B during translation initiation. EMBO J 25(19):4537-46 | |
| Singh CR, et al. (2004) Physical association of eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 5 carboxyl-terminal domain with the lysine-rich eIF2beta segment strongly enhances its binding to eIF3. J Biol Chem 279(48):49644-55 | |
| Maag D and Lorsch JR (2003) Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 1 and 1A on the yeast small ribosomal subunit. J Mol Biol 330(5):917-24 | |
| Algire MA, et al. (2002) Development and characterization of a reconstituted yeast translation initiation system. RNA 8(3):382-97 | |
| Valasek L, et al. (2002) Direct eIF2-eIF3 contact in the multifactor complex is important for translation initiation in vivo. EMBO J 21(21):5886-98 | |
| Erickson FL, et al. (2001) Minimum requirements for the function of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2. Genetics 158(1):123-32 | |
| Valasek L, et al. (2001) Related eIF3 subunits TIF32 and HCR1 interact with an RNA recognition motif in PRT1 required for eIF3 integrity and ribosome binding. EMBO J 20(4):891-904 | |
| Gora M, et al. (2000) Suppressors of translation initiation defect in hem12 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Acta Biochim Pol 47(1):181-90 |




