NHP10/YDL002C Literature Guide Help

Other names published for NHP10: HMO2, YDL002C

NHP10 - Additional Literature (24)

ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Kapoor P, et al.  (2013) Evidence for monomeric actin function in INO80 chromatin remodeling. Nat Struct Mol Biol 20(4):426-32
Sikorski TW, et al.  (2012) Proteomic analysis demonstrates activator- and chromatin-specific recruitment to promoters. J Biol Chem 287(42):35397-408
Weiner A, et al.  (2012) Systematic dissection of roles for chromatin regulators in a yeast stress response. PLoS Biol 10(7):e1001369
Chang HY, et al.  (2011) Genome-wide analysis to identify pathways affecting telomere-initiated senescence in budding yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 1(3):197-208
Charles GM, et al.  (2011) Site-specific acetylation mark on an essential chromatin-remodeling complex promotes resistance to replication stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(26):10620-5
Gordan R, et al.  (2011) Curated collection of yeast transcription factor DNA binding specificity data reveals novel structural and gene regulatory insights. Genome Biol 12(12):R125
Verzijlbergen KF, et al.  (2011) A barcode screen for epigenetic regulators reveals a role for the NuB4/HAT-B histone acetyltransferase complex in histone turnover. PLoS Genet 7(10):e1002284
Villa-Garcia MJ, et al.  (2011) Genome-wide screen for inositol auxotrophy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae implicates lipid metabolism in stress response signaling. Mol Genet Genomics 285(2):125-49
On T, et al.  (2010) The evolutionary landscape of the chromatin modification machinery reveals lineage specific gains, expansions, and losses. Proteins 78(9):2075-89
Hannum G, et al.  (2009) Genome-wide association data reveal a global map of genetic interactions among protein complexes. PLoS Genet 5(12):e1000782
Li L, et al.  (2009) Budding yeast SSD1-V regulates transcript levels of many longevity genes and extends chronological life span in purified quiescent cells. Mol Biol Cell 20(17):3851-64
Roberts GG 3rd and Hudson AP  (2009) Rsf1p is required for an efficient metabolic shift from fermentative to glycerol-based respiratory growth in S. cerevisiae. Yeast 26(2):95-110
Sinha M, et al.  (2009) Recombinational repair within heterochromatin requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Cell 138(6):1109-21
Arnett DR, et al.  (2008) A proteomics analysis of yeast Mot1p protein-protein associations: insights into mechanism. Mol Cell Proteomics 7(11):2090-106
Biswas D, et al.  (2008) A Role for Chd1 and Set2 in Negatively Regulating DNA Replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 178(2):649-59
Shevchenko A, et al.  (2008) Chromatin Central: towards the comparative proteome by accurate mapping of the yeast proteomic environment. Genome Biol 9(11):R167
Morrison AJ, et al.  (2007) Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses. Cell 130(3):499-511
Wong J, et al.  (2007) A Protein Interaction Map of the Mitotic Spindle. Mol Biol Cell 18(10):3800-3809
Yadav J, et al.  (2007) A phenomics approach in yeast links proton and calcium pump function in the Golgi. Mol Biol Cell 18(4):1480-9
Beskow A and Wright AP  (2006) Comparative analysis of regulatory transcription factors in Schizosaccharomyces pombe and budding yeasts. Yeast 23(13):929-35
Mah AS, et al.  (2005) Substrate specificity analysis of protein kinase complex Dbf2-Mob1 by peptide library and proteome array screening. BMC Biochem 6():22
Tong AH, et al.  (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303(5659):808-13
Huh WK, et al.  (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425(6959):686-91
Samanta MP and Liang S  (2003) Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(22):12579-83