DDC1/YPL194W Literature Guide Help

Other names published for DDC1: YPL194W

DDC1 - Additional Literature (72)

Results: 1 - 30 of 72 records
   1  2  3 
ReferenceOther Genes Addressed
Gazy I, et al.  (2013) A Genetic Screen for High Copy Number Suppressors of the Synthetic Lethality Between elg1Delta and srs2Delta in Yeast. G3 (Bethesda) 3(5):917-26
Grandin N and Charbonneau M  (2013) RPA provides checkpoint-independent cell cycle arrest and prevents recombination at uncapped telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 12(3):212-26
Kozmin SG and Jinks-Robertson S  (2013) The mechanism of nucleotide excision repair-mediated UV-induced mutagenesis in nonproliferating cells. Genetics 193(3):803-17
Berens TJ and Toczyski DP  (2012) Colocalization of Mec1 and Mrc1 is sufficient for Rad53 phosphorylation in vivo. Mol Biol Cell 23(6):1058-67
Costelloe T, et al.  (2012) The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection. Nature 489(7417):581-4
Cremona CA, et al.  (2012) Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint. Mol Cell 45(3):422-32
Poli J, et al.  (2012) dNTP pools determine fork progression and origin usage under replication stress. EMBO J 31(4):883-94
Silva S, et al.  (2012) Live Cell Microscopy of DNA Damage Response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Mol Biol 920():433-43
Addinall SG, et al.  (2011) Quantitative Fitness Analysis Shows That NMD Proteins and Many Other Protein Complexes Suppress or Enhance Distinct Telomere Cap Defects. PLoS Genet 7(4):e1001362
Alabrudzinska M, et al.  (2011) Dipoid-Specific Genome Stability Genes of S. cerevisiae: Genomic Screen Reveals Haploidization as an Escape from Persisting DNA Rearrangement Stress. PLoS One 6(6):e21124
Ambroset C, et al.  (2011) Deciphering the molecular basis of wine yeast fermentation traits using a combined genetic and genomic approach. G3 (Bethesda) 1(4):263-81
Eckert-Boulet N, et al.  (2011) Cell biology of homologous recombination in yeast. Methods Mol Biol 745():523-36
Minca EC and Kowalski D  (2011) Replication fork stalling by bulky DNA damage: localization at active origins and checkpoint modulation. Nucleic Acids Res 39(7):2610-23
Navadgi-Patil VM, et al.  (2011) The unstructured C-terminal tail of yeast Dpb11 (human TopBP1) protein is dispensable for DNA replication and the S phase checkpoint but required for the G2/M checkpoint. J Biol Chem 286(47):40999-1007
Puddu F, et al.  (2011) Sensing of Replication Stress and Mec1 Activation Act through Two Independent Pathways Involving the 9-1-1 Complex and DNA Polymerase epsilon. PLoS Genet 7(3):e1002022
Reha-Krantz LJ, et al.  (2011) Drug-sensitive DNA polymerase d reveals a role for mismatch repair in checkpoint activation in yeast. Genetics 189(4):1211-24
Reid RJ, et al.  (2011) Selective ploidy ablation, a high-throughput plasmid transfer protocol, identifies new genes affecting topoisomerase I-induced DNA damage. Genome Res 21(3):477-86
Yeung M and Durocher D  (2011) Srs2 enables checkpoint recovery by promoting disassembly of DNA damage foci from chromatin. DNA Repair (Amst) 10(12):1213-22
Crabbe L, et al.  (2010) Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response. Nat Struct Mol Biol 17(11):1391-1397
Donnianni RA, et al.  (2010) Elevated levels of the polo kinase Cdc5 override the Mec1/ATR checkpoint in budding yeast by acting at different steps of the signaling pathway. PLoS Genet 6(1):e1000763
Janke R, et al.  (2010) A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res 38(7):2302-13
On T, et al.  (2010) The evolutionary landscape of the chromatin modification machinery reveals lineage specific gains, expansions, and losses. Proteins 78(9):2075-89
Vidanes GM, et al.  (2010) CDC5 Inhibits the Hyperphosphorylation of the Checkpoint Kinase Rad53, Leading to Checkpoint Adaptation. PLoS Biol 8(1):e1000286
Gomez-Gonzalez B, et al.  (2009) The S-phase checkpoint is required to respond to R-loops accumulated in THO mutants. Mol Cell Biol 29(19):5203-13
Pages V, et al.  (2009) Role of DNA damage-induced replication checkpoint in promoting lesion bypass by translesion synthesis in yeast. Genes Dev 23(12):1438-49
Addinall SG, et al.  (2008) A Genomewide Suppressor and Enhancer Analysis of cdc13-1 Reveals Varied Cellular Processes Influencing Telomere Capping in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180(4):2251-66
Baldo V, et al.  (2008) Dominant TEL1-hy mutations compensate for Mec1 lack of functions in the DNA damage response. Mol Cell Biol 28(1):358-75
Cheung V, et al.  (2008) Chromatin- and Transcription-Related Factors Repress Transcription from within Coding Regions throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genome. PLoS Biol 6(11):e277
Fu Y, et al.  (2008) Rad6-Rad18 mediates a eukaryotic SOS response by ubiquitinating the 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp. Cell 133(4):601-11
Mordes DA and Cortez D  (2008) Activation of ATR and related PIKKs. Cell Cycle 7(18):2809-12
Results: 1 - 30 of 72 records
   1  2  3