GEP3/YOR205C Summary Help

GEP3 BASIC INFORMATION

Standard Name GEP3 1
Systematic Name YOR205C
Alias FMP38 2 , AIM40 3
Feature Type ORF, Verified
Description Protein of unknown function; null mutant is defective in respiration and interacts synthetically with prohibitin (phb1); the authentic, non-tagged protein is detected in purified mitochondria in high-throughput studies (1, 3, 4)
Name Description GEnetic interactors of Prohibitins 1
GO Annotations All GEP3 GO evidence and references
    View Computational GO annotations for GEP3
Molecular Function
Manually curated
Biological Process
Manually curated
Cellular Component
High-throughput
Retired NameLRC5
Mutant Phenotype All GEP3 Phenotype details and references
Large-scale survey
null
overexpression
Interactions GEP3 All interactions details and references
12 total interaction(s) for 12 unique genes/features.
Physical Interactions
  • Affinity Capture-MS: 1

Genetic Interactions
  • Synthetic Growth Defect: 10
  • Synthetic Lethality: 1

Sequence Information
ChrXV:727235 to 725565 | ORF Map | GBrowse
Note: this feature is encoded on the Crick strand.
Gbrowse
Last Update Coordinates: 2006-01-05 | Sequence: 1996-07-31
Subfeature details
Relative
Coordinates
Chromosomal
Coordinates
Most Recent Updates
Coordinates Sequence
CDS 1..1671 727235..725565 2006-01-05 1996-07-31
External Links All Associated Seq | Entrez Gene | Entrez RefSeq Protein | MIPS | UniProtKB
Primary SGDIDS000005731

GEP3 RESOURCES

Click on map for expanded view
SGD ORF mapGBrowse
SGD ORF map
GBrowse
  • Literature
  • Retrieve Sequences
  • Sequence Analysis Tools
  • Protein Info & Structure
  • Localization Resources
  • Interactions
  • Phenotype Resources
  • Maps & Displays
  • Comparison Resources
  • Functional Analysis

Click on histogram for expression summary
Expression Summary histogram

REFERENCES CITED ON THIS PAGE [View Complete Literature Guide for GEP3]

1) Osman C, et al.  (2009) The genetic interactome of prohibitins: coordinated control of cardiolipin and phosphatidylethanolamine by conserved regulators in mitochondria. J Cell Biol 184(4):583-96
2) Rehling, P., et al.  (2004) personal communication
3) Hess DC, et al.  (2009) Computationally driven, quantitative experiments discover genes required for mitochondrial biogenesis. PLoS Genet 5(3):e1000407
4) Reinders J, et al.  (2006) Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics. J Proteome Res 5(7):1543-54