Ontology: Biological Process (GO:0034401)
Definition: Any cellular process that results in the specification, formation or maintenance of the physical structure of eukaryotic chromatin that modulates the rate, frequency or extent of DNA-dependent transcription.
Synonyms: establishment or maintenance of chromatin architecture during transcription; regulation of transcription by chromatin organisation
View Ontology:
(graph) |
(text)
Definition: Any cellular process that results in the specification, formation or maintenance of the physical structure of eukaryotic chromatin that modulates the rate, frequency or extent of DNA-dependent transcription.
Synonyms: establishment or maintenance of chromatin architecture during transcription; regulation of transcription by chromatin organisation
View Ontology:
(graph) |
This table lists the methods used to annotate genes either directly to the term
regulation of transcription by chromatin organization (18 genes)
or to its variants containing one or more
qualifiers (0 genes). Note that some genes may have been annotated by more than one method so the numbers in the table below may not add up to the totals given here.
Links to Additional Annotations:
| Annotation Method | GO Term | # Yeast Genes Annotated |
|---|---|---|
| Manually curated (download data) | regulation of transcription by chromatin organization | 18 |
| High-throughput | none | none |
| Computational | none | none |
Links to Additional Annotations:
- View
annotations in multiple organisms using

- Search for S. cerevisiae genes annotated, by the Manually curated or High-throughput methods, to this term or to any terms that are descended from this term, i.e., child terms representing more specific biology than this term.
Annotation details for genes that have been directly annotated to the term
regulation of transcription by chromatin organization or its variants containing one or more
qualifiers (NOT, contributes to, or colocalizes with).
| regulation of transcription by chromatin organization 18 genes directly annotated to this term |
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | Evidence | Annotation Method | Reference | Assigned By |
| ADR1/YDR216W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-10-04 |
manually curated | Agricola E, et al. (2004) Common chromatin architecture, common chromatin remodeling, and common transcription kinetics of Adr1-dependent genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochemistry 43(27):8878-84 | SGD |
| IGI: Inferred from Genetic Interaction with SGD:GCN5, SGD:ADA2, IPI: Inferred from Physical Interaction with SGD:GCN5, SGD:ADA2 Assigned on 2011-10-04 |
manually curated | Chiang YC, et al. (1996) ADR1 activation domains contact the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 and the core transcriptional factor TFIIB. J Biol Chem 271(50):32359-65 | SGD | |
| BDF1/YLR399C | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2012-01-19 |
manually curated | Ladurner AG, et al. (2003) Bromodomains mediate an acetyl-histone encoded antisilencing function at heterochromatin boundaries. Mol Cell 11(2):365-76 | SGD |
| CHD1/YER164W | IGI: Inferred from Genetic Interaction with SGD:SNF2 Assigned on 2011-10-03 |
manually curated | Tran HG, et al. (2000) The chromo domain protein chd1p from budding yeast is an ATP-dependent chromatin-modifying factor. EMBO J 19(10):2323-31 | SGD |
| IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-10-07 |
manually curated | Xella B, et al. (2006) The ISWI and CHD1 chromatin remodelling activities influence ADH2 expression and chromatin organization. Mol Microbiol 59(5):1531-41 | SGD | |
| CTR9/YOL145C | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-11-11 |
manually curated | Marton HA and Desiderio S (2008) The Paf1 complex promotes displacement of histones upon rapid induction of transcription by RNA polymerase II. BMC Mol Biol 9():4 | SGD |
| ELF1/YKL160W | IGI: Inferred from Genetic Interaction with SGD:HIR1, IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-06-28 |
manually curated | Prather D, et al. (2005) Identification and characterization of Elf1, a conserved transcription elongation factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 25(22):10122-35 | SGD |
| ESA1/YOR244W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2009-05-15 |
manually curated | Verdone L, et al. (2002) Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J 21(5):1101-11 | SGD |
| FPR4/YLR449W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2012-03-09 |
manually curated | Nelson CJ, et al. (2006) Proline isomerization of histone h3 regulates lysine methylation and gene expression. Cell 126(5):905-16 | SGD |
| GCN5/YGR252W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2009-05-15 |
manually curated | Verdone L, et al. (2002) Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J 21(5):1101-11 | SGD |
| HDA1/YNL021W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2009-05-15 |
manually curated | Verdone L, et al. (2002) Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J 21(5):1101-11 | SGD |
| HMO1/YDR174W | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2010-03-17 |
manually curated | Merz K, et al. (2008) Actively transcribed rRNA genes in S. cerevisiae are organized in a specialized chromatin associated with the high-mobility group protein Hmo1 and are largely devoid of histone molecules. Genes Dev 22(9):1190-204 | SGD |
| ISW1/YBR245C | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-10-07 |
manually curated | Xella B, et al. (2006) The ISWI and CHD1 chromatin remodelling activities influence ADH2 expression and chromatin organization. Mol Microbiol 59(5):1531-41 | SGD |
| PAF1/YBR279W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-11-11 |
manually curated | Marton HA and Desiderio S (2008) The Paf1 complex promotes displacement of histones upon rapid induction of transcription by RNA polymerase II. BMC Mol Biol 9():4 | SGD |
| POB3/YML069W | IC: Inferred By Curator from FACT complex Assigned on 2010-03-05 |
manually curated | Jamai A, et al. (2009) Histone chaperone spt16 promotes redeposition of the original h3-h4 histones evicted by elongating RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 35(3):377-83 | SGD |
| RAP1/YNL216W | IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2012-05-02 |
manually curated | Yu L and Morse RH (1999) Chromatin opening and transactivator potentiation by RAP1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19(8):5279-88 | SGD |
| RPD3/YNL330C | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2009-05-15 |
manually curated | Verdone L, et al. (2002) Hyperacetylation of chromatin at the ADH2 promoter allows Adr1 to bind in repressed conditions. EMBO J 21(5):1101-11 | SGD |
| IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2010-07-12 |
manually curated | Kadosh D and Struhl K (1998) Targeted recruitment of the Sin3-Rpd3 histone deacetylase complex generates a highly localized domain of repressed chromatin in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 18(9):5121-7 | SGD | |
| SPN1/YPR133C | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-08-26 |
manually curated | Hainer SJ, et al. (2011) Intergenic transcription causes repression by directing nucleosome assembly. Genes Dev 25(1):29-40 | SGD |
| IPI: Inferred from Physical Interaction with SGD:SPT6 Assigned on 2011-08-26 |
manually curated | McDonald SM, et al. (2010) Structure and biological importance of the Spn1-Spt6 interaction, and its regulatory role in nucleosome binding. Mol Cell 40(5):725-35 | SGD | |
| SPT16/YGL207W | IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2010-03-05 |
manually curated | Jamai A, et al. (2009) Histone chaperone spt16 promotes redeposition of the original h3-h4 histones evicted by elongating RNA polymerase. Mol Cell 35(3):377-83 | SGD |
| SPT6/YGR116W | IGI: Inferred from Genetic Interaction with SGD:SNF5, IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-10-13 |
manually curated | Bortvin A and Winston F (1996) Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 272(5267):1473-6 | SGD |
| IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2008-05-05 |
manually curated | Kaplan CD, et al. (2003) Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301(5636):1096-9 | SGD | |
| IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2011-08-26 |
manually curated | Hainer SJ, et al. (2011) Intergenic transcription causes repression by directing nucleosome assembly. Genes Dev 25(1):29-40 | SGD | |





