This page displays GO annotations in different sections according to the annotation method used to add that annotation to SGD.

Last Reviewed on: 2006-07-05    Molecular Function | Biological Process | Cellular Component

Manually curated Molecular Function
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
TBP-class protein binding	IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2006-07-05	Sterner DE, et al.  (1999) Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA-binding protein interaction. Mol Cell Biol 19(1):86-98	SGD
	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2006-07-05	Warfield L, et al.  (2004) Positive and negative functions of the SAGA complex mediated through interaction of Spt8 with TBP and the N-terminal domain of TFIIA. Genes Dev 18(9):1022-34	SGD
transcription cofactor activity	IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2002-11-14 IPI: Inferred from Physical Interaction Assigned on 2002-11-14	Sterner DE, et al.  (1999) Functional organization of the yeast SAGA complex: distinct components involved in structural integrity, nucleosome acetylation, and TATA-binding protein interaction. Mol Cell Biol 19(1):86-98	SGD

Manually curated Biological Process
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
chromatin modification	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2009-09-03	Grant PA, et al.  (1998) A subset of TAF(II)s are integral components of the SAGA complex required for nucleosome acetylation and transcriptional stimulation. Cell 94(1):45-53	SGD
histone acetylation	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2009-09-03	Grant PA, et al.  (1998) A subset of TAF(II)s are integral components of the SAGA complex required for nucleosome acetylation and transcriptional stimulation. Cell 94(1):45-53	SGD
negative regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter	IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2006-07-05 IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2006-07-05	Belotserkovskaya R, et al.  (2000) Inhibition of TATA-binding protein function by SAGA subunits Spt3 and Spt8 at Gcn4-activated promoters. Mol Cell Biol 20(2):634-47	SGD
positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter	IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2006-07-05	Bhaumik SR and Green MR  (2002) Differential requirement of SAGA components for recruitment of TATA-box-binding protein to promoters in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 22(21):7365-71	SGD

Manually curated Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
SAGA complex	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2001-02-21	Grant PA, et al.  (1998) A subset of TAF(II)s are integral components of the SAGA complex required for nucleosome acetylation and transcriptional stimulation. Cell 94(1):45-53	SGD

* Manually curated GO annotations reflect our best understanding of the basic molecular function, biological process, and cellular component for this gene product. Manually curated annotations are assigned by SGD curators based on published papers when available, or by curatorial statements if necessary. Curators periodically review all Manually curated GO annotations for accuracy and completeness. The "Last Reviewed on:" date at the top of this section indicates when these annotations were last reviewed.

Cellular Component

High-throughput Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
nucleus	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2002-05-07	Kumar A, et al.  (2002) Subcellular localization of the yeast proteome. Genes Dev 16(6):707-19	SGD

** GO annotations from High-throughput experiments are made based on a variety of large scale high-throughput experiments, including genome-wide experiments. Many of these annotations are made based on GO annotations (or mappings to GO annotations) assigned by the authors, rather than SGD curators. While SGD curators read these publications and often work closely with authors to incorporate the information, each individual annotation may not necessarily be reviewed by a curator. GO Annotations from high-throughput experiments will be assigned only when this type of data is available, and thus may not be assigned in all three aspects of the Gene Ontologies.

Biological Process | Cellular Component

Computational Biological Process
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0805 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB
transcription, DNA-dependent	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0804 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB

Computational Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
nucleus	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:SL-0191 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on the manual assignment of UniProtKB Subcellular Location terms in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB
	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0539 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB

*** Computational GO Annotations are predictions. These annotations are NOT reviewed by a curator. Currently, all computational GO annotations for S. cerevisiae are assigned by an external source (for example, the Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) project of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)).