This page displays GO annotations in different sections according to the annotation method used to add that annotation to SGD.

Last Reviewed on: 2006-03-21    Molecular Function | Biological Process | Cellular Component

Manually curated Molecular Function
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
molecular_function unknown	ND: No Biological Data Available Assigned on 2006-03-21	SGD  (2002) Use of the ND evidence code for Gene Ontology (GO) terms in SGD ()	SGD

Manually curated Biological Process
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
chromatin remodeling	IC: Inferred By Curator from RSC complex Assigned on 2012-02-13	Baetz KK, et al.  (2004) The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 24(3):1232-44	SGD
chromosome segregation	IMP: Inferred from Mutant Phenotype Assigned on 2012-02-13	Baetz KK, et al.  (2004) The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 24(3):1232-44	SGD
nucleosome disassembly	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2008-09-10	Lorch Y, et al.  (2006) Chromatin remodeling by nucleosome disassembly in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103(9):3090-3	SGD
transcription elongation from RNA polymerase II promoter	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2007-03-29	Carey M, et al.  (2006) RSC exploits histone acetylation to abrogate the nucleosomal block to RNA polymerase II elongation. Mol Cell 24(3):481-7	SGD

Manually curated Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
RSC complex	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2012-02-13	Baetz KK, et al.  (2004) The ctf13-30/CTF13 genomic haploinsufficiency modifier screen identifies the yeast chromatin remodeling complex RSC, which is required for the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 24(3):1232-44	SGD
SWI/SNF complex	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2009-10-15	Dechassa ML, et al.  (2008) Architecture of the SWI/SNF-nucleosome complex. Mol Cell Biol 28(19):6010-21	SGD
	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2012-02-13	Lee KK, et al.  (2004) Proteomic analysis of chromatin-modifying complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies novel subunits. Biochem Soc Trans 32(Pt 6):899-903	SGD

* Manually curated GO annotations reflect our best understanding of the basic molecular function, biological process, and cellular component for this gene product. Manually curated annotations are assigned by SGD curators based on published papers when available, or by curatorial statements if necessary. Curators periodically review all Manually curated GO annotations for accuracy and completeness. The "Last Reviewed on:" date at the top of this section indicates when these annotations were last reviewed.

Cellular Component

High-throughput Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
nucleus	IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay Assigned on 2003-10-28	Huh WK, et al.  (2003) Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425(6959):686-91	SGD

** GO annotations from High-throughput experiments are made based on a variety of large scale high-throughput experiments, including genome-wide experiments. Many of these annotations are made based on GO annotations (or mappings to GO annotations) assigned by the authors, rather than SGD curators. While SGD curators read these publications and often work closely with authors to incorporate the information, each individual annotation may not necessarily be reviewed by a curator. GO Annotations from high-throughput experiments will be assigned only when this type of data is available, and thus may not be assigned in all three aspects of the Gene Ontologies.

Biological Process | Cellular Component

Computational Biological Process
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0805 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB
transcription, DNA-dependent	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0804 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB

Computational Cellular Component
Annotation(s)	Evidence	Reference(s)	Assigned By
nucleus	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:SL-0191 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on the manual assignment of UniProtKB Subcellular Location terms in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB
	IEA: Inferred from Electronic Annotation with EBI:KW-0539 Last updated 2013-03-02	UniProt-GOA  (2011) Gene Ontology annotation based on manual assignment of UniProtKB keywords in UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot entries.	UniProtKB

*** Computational GO Annotations are predictions. These annotations are NOT reviewed by a curator. Currently, all computational GO annotations for S. cerevisiae are assigned by an external source (for example, the Gene Ontology Annotation (GOA) project of the European Bioinformatics Institute (EBI)).